Bili\u015fim hukuku alan\u0131nda bir karar\u0131 payla\u015f\u0131yorum.<\/p>\n\n\n
Kaynak: http:\/\/www.kazanci.com\/kho2\/ibb\/giris.htm<\/p>\n
T.C.<\/strong><\/p>\n YARGITAY <\/strong><\/p>\n 17. CEZA DA\u0130RES\u0130<\/strong><\/p>\n E.2015\/18605<\/strong><\/p>\n K. 2015\/8102<\/strong><\/p>\n KT: <\/strong>22.10.2015<\/strong><\/p>\n DAVA : <\/strong>Mahalli mahkemece verilen h\u00fck\u00fcm temyiz edilmekle incelenerek, gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n KARAR : <\/strong>Di\u011fer temyiz nedenleri de yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n Ancak;<\/p>\n 1-) …’un g\u00f6nderdi\u011fi yaz\u0131da, su\u00e7 tarihlerinde sistemin g\u00fcvenli olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ve m\u00fc\u015ftekinin bilgisayar\u0131 \u00fczerindeki vir\u00fcs, trojan ve casus program kontrollerinin s\u0131k s\u0131k yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011finin belirtilmesi, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u0131srarla su\u00e7lamalar\u0131 kabul etmemesi ve yeterince bilgiye sahip olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtmesi kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n ve m\u00fc\u015ftekinin hem modemleri ve hem de bilgisayarlar\u0131 ile internet hatlar\u0131 \u00fczerinde ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 incelemeler yap\u0131larak m\u00fc\u015ftekinin \u015fifresinin hangi yolla elde edildi\u011finin, kullan\u0131lan IP adreslerinin t\u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fcn ve hangi bilgisayarlara ait oldu\u011funun, bilgisayarlar\u0131n hangi adreslerde bulundu\u011funun, k\u0131sa aral\u0131klarla san\u0131klar\u0131n farkl\u0131 yerlerde bulunma imk\u00e2nlar\u0131n\u0131n bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ve san\u0131\u011f\u0131n internet arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 ile m\u00fc\u015ftekinin bilgisayar\u0131na her hangi bir vir\u00fcs, trojan ya da casus yaz\u0131l\u0131m g\u00f6nderip g\u00f6ndermedi\u011finin bilgisayar m\u00fchendisi bilirki\u015fi marifetiyle tespiti ile sonucuna g\u00f6re san\u0131\u011f\u0131n hukuki durumunun tayini gerekirken,… yaz\u0131s\u0131n\u0131 teyit etmenin \u00f6tesine ge\u00e7meyen ve san\u0131k ile m\u00fc\u015ftekinin bilgisayarlar\u0131, modemleri ve internet hatlar\u0131 \u00fczerinde her hangi bir ara\u015ft\u0131rma i\u00e7ermeyen dolay\u0131s\u0131yla yetersiz olan elektrik m\u00fchendisi olan bilirki\u015finin d\u00fczenledi\u011fi rapora dayan\u0131larak eksik inceleme ile h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131<\/p>\n 2-) \u0130ddianame ile san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda 5237 Say\u0131l\u0131 TCK’n\u0131n 244<\/a>\/4 maddesinin uygulanmas\u0131 istemiyle kamu davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 halde, 5271 Say\u0131l\u0131 CMK’n\u0131n 226<\/a>. maddesi gere\u011fince ek savunma hakk\u0131 verilmeden, san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda ayn\u0131 Kanun’un 163\/2. maddesi uyar\u0131nca h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131,<\/p>\n 3-) Su\u00e7 tarihleri ve san\u0131\u011f\u0131n m\u00fc\u015ftekinin hatt\u0131n\u0131 kullanarak internete ba\u011fland\u0131\u011f\u0131 tarihler kesin olarak belirlenmeden \u015fik\u00e2yet tarihinin su\u00e7 tarihi olarak kabul edilmesi,<\/p>\n SONU\u00c7 : <\/strong>Bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015f, san\u0131k …’n\u0131n temyiz nedeni bu itibarla yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f oldu\u011fundan, h\u00fckm\u00fcn a\u00e7\u0131klanan sebeple tebli\u011fnameye uygun olarak BOZULMASINA, 22.10.2015 tarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n Avukat Dr. \u015eaban Cankat TA\u015eKIN-Bursa Barosu<\/p>\n \u00a0<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Bili\u015fim hukuku alan\u0131nda bir karar\u0131 payla\u015f\u0131yorum. Kaynak: http:\/\/www.kazanci.com\/kho2\/ibb\/giris.htm T.C. YARGITAY 17. CEZA DA\u0130RES\u0130 E.2015\/18605 K. 2015\/8102 KT: 22.10.2015 DAVA : Mahalli mahkemece verilen h\u00fck\u00fcm temyiz edilmekle incelenerek, gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc: KARAR : Di\u011fer temyiz nedenleri de yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir. Ancak; 1-) … Okumaya devam et