{"id":1614,"date":"2018-05-08T13:53:40","date_gmt":"2018-05-08T10:53:40","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/cankattaskin.av.tr\/?p=1614"},"modified":"2024-09-12T13:37:56","modified_gmt":"2024-09-12T10:37:56","slug":"yargitay-matufiyet-sarti-gerceklesmisse-internetten-hakaret-oldugu-kabul-edilir","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cankattaskin.av.tr\/?p=1614","title":{"rendered":"YARGITAY: MATUF\u0130YET \u015eARTI GER\u00c7EKLE\u015eM\u0130\u015eSE \u0130NTERNETTEN HAKARET OLDU\u011eU KABUL ED\u0130L\u0130R."},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Bili\u015fim hukuku alan\u0131nda bir karar\u0131 payla\u015f\u0131yorum.<\/p>\n\n\n<p>Yarg\u0131tay 4.HD, internet z\u00fcerinden hakaret eyleminde &#8220;matufiyet&#8221; (anla\u015f\u0131labilirlik\/ay\u0131rt edilebilirlik) ko\u015fulunun bulunmas\u0131 durumunda haks\u0131z fiilin ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fini ve tazminata h\u00fckmedilmesi gerekti\u011fine karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>Kaynak: http:\/\/www.kazanci.com\/kho2\/ibb\/giris.htm<\/p>\n<p>YARGITAY<\/p>\n<ol start=\"4\">\n<li>HUKUK DA\u0130RES\u0130\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 E. 2016\/2955\u00a0 K.2017\/8684\u00a0\u00a0 T:26.12.2017<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<ul>\n<li>MANEV\u0130 TAZM\u0130NAT DAVASI (Daval\u0131n\u0131n \u0130fadelerinin Davac\u0131lara Matuf Olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 &#8211; \u0130nternet Yoluyla Ki\u015filik Haklar\u0131na Sald\u0131r\u0131dan Kaynaklanan Manevi Tazminat \u0130stemine Dair Davan\u0131n Matufiyet Unsuru Ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmedi\u011finden Reddine Karar Verilmesi Gerekti\u011fi)<\/li>\n<li>MATUF\u0130YET \u015eARTI (\u0130\u00e7tihatlarda Ad\u0131 San\u0131 Kimli\u011fi Belli Olmasa da Ona Y\u00f6neldi\u011fi Konusunda Ku\u015fku B\u0131rakmayacak \u015eekilde \u0130thamlara Y\u00f6nelimlere Yer Veren \u0130fadeler Olarak Kabul Edildi\u011fi &#8211; \u0130nternet Yoluyla Ki\u015filik Haklar\u0131na Sald\u0131r\u0131dan Kaynaklanan Manevi Tazminat \u0130stemine Dair Davan\u0131n Matufiyet Unsuru Ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmedi\u011finden Reddi Gerekti\u011fi)<\/li>\n<li>K\u0130\u015e\u0130L\u0130K HAKLARINA SALDIRI (Daval\u0131n\u0131n Sosyal Payla\u015f\u0131m A\u011f\u0131 Hesab\u0131 \u00dczerinden Yazd\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u0130fadelerde Ortalama Bir Ki\u015finin Daval\u0131n\u0131n S\u00f6zlerini G\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc Anda S\u00f6zlerin Muhatab\u0131n\u0131n Davac\u0131lar Oldu\u011funu Anlayamayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n G\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc &#8211; Daval\u0131n\u0131n \u0130fadelerinin Davac\u0131lara Matuf Olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n Kabul\u00fc Gerekti\u011fi)<\/li>\n<li>SOSYAL MEDYA ARACILI\u011eIYLA HAKARET (Manevi Tazminat &#8211; Daval\u0131n\u0131n Sosyal Payla\u015f\u0131m A\u011f\u0131 Hesab\u0131 \u00dczerinden Yazd\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u0130fadelerde Ortalama Bir Ki\u015finin Daval\u0131n\u0131n S\u00f6zlerini G\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc Anda S\u00f6zlerin Muhatab\u0131n\u0131n Davac\u0131lar Oldu\u011funu Anlayamayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n G\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc\/Davan\u0131n Matufiyet Unsuru Ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmedi\u011finden Reddi Gerekti\u011fi)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>4721\/m.24<\/p>\n<p>\u00d6ZET : Dava, internet yoluyla ki\u015filik haklar\u0131n\u0131n ihlali sebebiyle manevi tazminat istemine ili\u015fkindir. \u00d6zellikle ki\u015filik haklar\u0131na sald\u0131r\u0131 sebebiyle tazminat istemini i\u00e7eren davalarda s\u00f6z konusu olan matufiyet \u015fart\u0131, a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a kanunda yer almamakla birlikte, Yarg\u0131tay i\u00e7tihatlar\u0131yla hukukumuza girmi\u015ftir. Matufiyet \u015fart\u0131 i\u00e7tihatlarda ad\u0131, san\u0131, kimli\u011fi belli olmasa da ona y\u00f6neldi\u011fi konusunda ku\u015fku b\u0131rakmayacak \u015fekilde ithamlara, y\u00f6nelimlere yer veren ifadeler olarak kabul edilmektedir. Somut olayda, daval\u0131n\u0131n sosyal payla\u015f\u0131m a\u011f\u0131 hesab\u0131 \u00fczerinden yazd\u0131\u011f\u0131 ifadelerde, ortalama bir ki\u015finin daval\u0131n\u0131n s\u00f6zlerini g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc anda s\u00f6zlerin muhatab\u0131n\u0131n davac\u0131lar oldu\u011funu anlayamayaca\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Bu durumda daval\u0131n\u0131n ifadelerinin davac\u0131lara matuf olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fc gerekir. O halde, internet yoluyla ki\u015filik haklar\u0131na sald\u0131r\u0131dan kaynaklanan manevi tazminat istemine dair davan\u0131n, matufiyet unsuru ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmedi\u011finden reddine karar verilmesi gerekirken, yerinde olmayan gerek\u00e7eyle yaz\u0131l\u0131 bi\u00e7imde karar verilmi\u015f olmas\u0131 usul ve yasaya uygun d\u00fc\u015fmedi\u011finden karar\u0131n bozulmas\u0131 gerekmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>DAVA : Davac\u0131lar &#8230; ve &#8230; vekili taraf\u0131ndan, daval\u0131 &#8230; aleyhine 14\/04\/2015 g\u00fcn\u00fcnde verilen dilek\u00e7eyle internet yoluyla ki\u015filik haklar\u0131n\u0131n ihlali sebebiyle manevi tazminat istenmesi \u00fczerine mahkemece yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda; davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne dair verilen 14\/12\/2015 tarihli karar\u0131n Yarg\u0131tay&#8217;ca incelenmesi daval\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde istenilmekle temyiz dilek\u00e7esinin kabul\u00fcne karar verildikten sonra tetkik hakimi taraf\u0131ndan haz\u0131rlanan rapor ile dosya i\u00e7erisindeki ka\u011f\u0131tlar incelenerek gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n<p>KARAR : Dava, internet yoluyla ki\u015filik haklar\u0131n\u0131n ihlali sebebiyle manevi tazminat istemine ili\u015fkindir. Mahkemece, davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne karar verilmi\u015f; h\u00fck\u00fcm, daval\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>Davac\u0131 ve\u2026<\/p>\n<p>\u015feklindeki payla\u015f\u0131m\u0131n ele\u015ftiri s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131 \u00f6tesine ge\u00e7ti\u011fi, bu sebeple davac\u0131lar\u0131n ki\u015filik haklar\u0131na sald\u0131r\u0131da bulunuldu\u011fu oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne karar verilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>Matufiyet kelime anlam\u0131 olarak, &#8220;y\u00f6neliklik, y\u00f6nelmi\u015f olmakl\u0131k&#8221; olarak tarif edilmektedir. \u00d6zellikle ki\u015filik haklar\u0131na sald\u0131r\u0131 sebebiyle tazminat istemini i\u00e7eren davalarda s\u00f6z konusu olan matufiyet \u015fart\u0131, a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a kanunda yer almamakla birlikte, Yarg\u0131tay i\u00e7tihatlar\u0131yla hukukumuza girmi\u015ftir. Matufiyet \u015fart\u0131 i\u00e7tihatlarda ad\u0131, san\u0131, kimli\u011fi belli olmasa da ona y\u00f6neldi\u011fi konusunda ku\u015fku b\u0131rakmayacak \u015fekilde ithamlara, y\u00f6nelimlere yer veren ifadeler olarak kabul edilmektedir.<\/p>\n<p>Matufiyet yarg\u0131sal kararlarda yay\u0131n ile \u015feref ve haysiyetine veya \u00f6zel ya\u015fam\u0131na dolay\u0131s\u0131yla ki\u015filik haklar\u0131na sald\u0131r\u0131da bulunuldu\u011funu iddia eden y\u00f6n\u00fcnden varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 aranan \u00f6nemli bir ko\u015ful olarak tarif edilmi\u015f, matufiyetin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 kabul i\u00e7in o yay\u0131nda veya konu\u015fmada, ya ki\u015finin ad\u0131ndan a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a s\u00f6z edilmesi ya da konumunun, s\u0131fat\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6sterilmesi veya bunlardan s\u00f6z edilmese dahi yay\u0131n i\u00e7eri\u011finden bu ki\u015finin ama\u00e7land\u0131\u011f\u0131, s\u00f6zlerin ona y\u00f6nelik oldu\u011funun anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 veya anla\u015f\u0131labilir olmas\u0131 \u015fartlar\u0131 aranm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>Hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 eylemde bulunan ki\u015fi ma\u011fdurun ismini a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a belirtmemi\u015f veya isnat etti\u011fi fiili \u00fcst\u00fc kapal\u0131 bir bi\u00e7imde ge\u00e7i\u015ftirmi\u015fse, isnad\u0131n mahiyetinde ve ma\u011fdurun \u015fahs\u0131na matufiyetinde teredd\u00fct edilmeyecek derecede karineler varsa, hem isim zikredilmi\u015f, hem de hakaret vaki olmu\u015f say\u0131l\u0131r (Hukuk Genel Kurulu 16\/09\/2015 g\u00fcn ve 2014\/4-85 E 2015\/1774 K- 07\/07\/2010 g\u00fcn ve 2010\/4-377 E 2010\/365 K).<\/p>\n<p>Bu ilke ve a\u00e7\u0131klamalar kapsam\u0131nda; somut olayda, daval\u0131n\u0131n sosyal payla\u015f\u0131m a\u011f\u0131 &#8230; hesab\u0131 \u00fczerinden yazd\u0131\u011f\u0131 ifadelerde, ortalama bir ki\u015finin daval\u0131n\u0131n s\u00f6zlerini g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc anda s\u00f6zlerin muhatab\u0131n\u0131n davac\u0131lar oldu\u011funu anlayamayaca\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Bu durumda daval\u0131n\u0131n ifadelerinin davac\u0131lara matuf olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n kabul\u00fc gerekir.<\/p>\n<p>O halde, internet yoluyla ki\u015filik haklar\u0131na sald\u0131r\u0131dan kaynaklanan manevi tazminat istemine dair davan\u0131n, matufiyet unsuru ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmedi\u011finden reddine karar verilmesi gerekirken, yerinde olmayan gerek\u00e7eyle yaz\u0131l\u0131 bi\u00e7imde karar verilmi\u015f olmas\u0131 usul ve yasaya uygun d\u00fc\u015fmedi\u011finden karar\u0131n bozulmas\u0131 gerekmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>SONU\u00c7 : Temyiz edilen karar\u0131n yukarda a\u00e7\u0131klanan sebeplerle daval\u0131 yarar\u0131na BOZULMASINA ve pe\u015fin al\u0131nan harc\u0131n istenmesi halinde iadesine, 26.12.2017 g\u00fcn\u00fcnde oy\u00e7oklu\u011fuyla karar verildi.<\/p>\n<p>Dava, sosyal medya uygulamalar\u0131ndan olan &#8230;dan daval\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6nderdi\u011fi tweet ad\u0131 verilen internet k\u0131sa mesajlar\u0131n\u0131n, davac\u0131lar\u0131n ki\u015filik haklar\u0131na sald\u0131r\u0131 olu\u015fturdu\u011fu iddias\u0131ndan kaynaklanan manevi tazminat istemine ili\u015fkindir. \u0130lk derece mahkemesinin, davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne dair karar\u0131, Dairemizin de\u011ferli \u00e7o\u011funlu\u011funca matufiyet unsurunun ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmedi\u011fi, dolay\u0131s\u0131yla davan\u0131n reddi gerekti\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle bozulmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n<p>Bilindi\u011fi \u00fczere; matufiyet kelime anlam\u0131 olarak, \u201cy\u00f6neliklik, y\u00f6nelmi\u015f olmak\u201d olarak tarif edilmekte olup, kanunlar\u0131m\u0131zda olmayan matufiyet \u015fart\u0131, Yarg\u0131tay i\u00e7tihatlar\u0131yla hukukumuza girmi\u015ftir. Ad\u0131, san\u0131 ve kimli\u011fi belli olmasa da ona y\u00f6neldi\u011fi konusunda ku\u015fku b\u0131rakm\u0131yacak \u015fekilde ithamlara ve isnatlara yer veren ifadeler olarak kabul edilmektedir.<\/p>\n<p>Hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 eylemde bulunan ki\u015fi ma\u011fdurun ismini a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a belirtmemi\u015f veya isnat etti\u011fi fiili \u00fcst\u00fc kapal\u0131 bir bi\u00e7imde ge\u00e7i\u015ftirmi\u015fse, isnad\u0131n mahiyetinden ve ma\u011fdurun \u015fahs\u0131na y\u00f6neltildi\u011finde teredd\u00fct edilmeyecek derecede karineler varsa, isim zikredilmemi\u015f olsa dahi, hakaret vaki olmu\u015f say\u0131l\u0131r.(HGK 16\/09\/2\/15 g\u00fcn ve 2014\/4-85 E. 2015\/1774 K.- 07\/07\/2010 g\u00fcn ve 2010\/4-377 E. 2010\/365 K.)<\/p>\n<p>Kald\u0131 ki somut olay\u0131m\u0131zda; daval\u0131 \u00f6zellikle cevap dilek\u00e7esinde, &#8230; TV&#8217;nin 08\/01\/2015 tarihli, davac\u0131lardan &#8230;&#8217;\u0131n haz\u0131rlay\u0131p sundu\u011fu di\u011fer davac\u0131 &#8230; ile dava dava d\u0131\u015f\u0131 &#8230;ve &#8230; &#8230;&#8217;nun konuk olarak kat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u201c&#8230; \u201d isimli programda, Cumhurba\u015fkan\u0131 ile ilgili hakaret ve iftira say\u0131labilecek yak\u0131\u015ft\u0131rmada bulunmalar\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 tepkisini ve d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncelerini sosyal medyada dile getirdi\u011fini, payla\u015f\u0131mlar\u0131n\u0131n ifade \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc kapsam\u0131nda kalan ele\u015ftiri ve yorum \u015feklinde oldu\u011funu, hakaret kast\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131mad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ifade etmek suretiyle payla\u015f\u0131mlar\u0131n\u0131n davac\u0131lara y\u00f6nelik oldu\u011funu kabul etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>Hal b\u00f6yle olunca; matufiyet \u015fart\u0131 ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011finden say\u0131n \u00e7o\u011funlu\u011fun bozma gerek\u00e7esine i\u015ftirak etmem m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olamam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. T\u00fcm bu nedenlerle, i\u015fin esastan temyiz incelemesi yap\u0131larak bir karar verilmesi gerekti\u011fi kanaat\u0131yla karara kat\u0131lm\u0131yorum.26\/12\/2017<\/p>\n<p>KAR\u015eI OY YAZISI<\/p>\n<p>Dosyadaki yaz\u0131lara, karar\u0131n dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 kan\u0131tlarla yasaya uygun gerektirici nedenlere, \u00f6zellikle delillerin de\u011ferlendirilmesinde bir isabetsizlik g\u00f6r\u00fclmemesine g\u00f6re yerinde bulunmayan temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n reddiyle usul ve yasaya uygun olan h\u00fckm\u00fcn onanmas\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnde oldu\u011fumdan say\u0131n \u00e7o\u011funlu\u011fun bozma karar\u0131na kat\u0131lm\u0131yorum.26\/12\/2017<\/p>\n<p>Avukat Dr. \u015eaban Cankat TA\u015eKIN-Bursa Barosu<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Bili\u015fim hukuku alan\u0131nda bir karar\u0131 payla\u015f\u0131yorum. Yarg\u0131tay 4.HD, internet z\u00fcerinden hakaret eyleminde &#8220;matufiyet&#8221; (anla\u015f\u0131labilirlik\/ay\u0131rt edilebilirlik) ko\u015fulunun bulunmas\u0131 durumunda haks\u0131z fiilin ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fini ve tazminata h\u00fckmedilmesi gerekti\u011fine karar vermi\u015ftir. Kaynak: http:\/\/www.kazanci.com\/kho2\/ibb\/giris.htm YARGITAY HUKUK DA\u0130RES\u0130\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 E. 2016\/2955\u00a0 K.2017\/8684\u00a0\u00a0 T:26.12.2017 MANEV\u0130 TAZM\u0130NAT DAVASI (Daval\u0131n\u0131n &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/cankattaskin.av.tr\/?p=1614\">Okumaya devam et <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[145,540,478,539,542],"class_list":["post-1614","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-genel","tag-av-s-cankat-taskin","tag-avukat","tag-avukat-cankat-taskin","tag-bursa","tag-saban-cankat-taskin"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cankattaskin.av.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1614","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cankattaskin.av.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cankattaskin.av.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cankattaskin.av.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cankattaskin.av.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1614"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/cankattaskin.av.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1614\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3274,"href":"https:\/\/cankattaskin.av.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1614\/revisions\/3274"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cankattaskin.av.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1614"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cankattaskin.av.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1614"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cankattaskin.av.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1614"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}