Bili\u015fim hukuku ve ceza hukuku alan\u0131nda bir karar\u0131 payla\u015f\u0131yorum<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Kaynak: http:\/\/www.kazanci.com\/kho2\/ibb\/giris.htm<\/p>\n\n\n\n
YARGITAY<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n 13. CEZA DA\u0130RES\u0130<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n E. 2017\/6445<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n K. 2018\/947<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n T. 18.1.2018<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n DAVA : <\/strong>Bili\u015fim sistemleri banka veya kredi kurumlar\u0131n\u0131n ara\u00e7\nolarak kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 suretiyle doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k, bili\u015fim sistemlerinin kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 suretiyle\nh\u0131rs\u0131zl\u0131k<\/strong> ve ba\u015fkas\u0131na ait banka veya kredi kart\u0131n\u0131n izinsiz\nkullan\u0131lmas\u0131 suretiyle yarar sa\u011flama su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan \u015f\u00fcpheli … ve kimli\u011fi me\u00e7hul\n\u015f\u00fcpheli haklar\u0131nda yap\u0131lan soru\u015fturma evresi sonucunda, Eski\u015fehir Cumhuriyet\nBa\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nca verilen 06\/01\/2017 tarihli ve 2016\/40980 soru\u015fturma, 2017\/705\nSay\u0131l\u0131 kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair karara y\u00f6nelik itiraz\u0131n reddine dair\nEski\u015fehir 2. Sulh Ceza H\u00e2kimli\u011finin 20\/02\/2017 tarihli ve 2017\/841 de\u011fi\u015fik i\u015f\nsay\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131, Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131’n\u0131n 03.07.2017 g\u00fcn ve\n94660652-105-26-4563-2017-Kyb say\u0131l\u0131 yaz\u0131s\u0131 ile kanun yarar\u0131na bozma ihbar\u0131nda\nbulunuldu\u011fundan Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131’n\u0131n 10.07.2017 g\u00fcn ve\n2017\/42257 Say\u0131l\u0131 ihbarnamesiyle Dairemize g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi, <\/p>\n\n\n\n MEZKUR \u0130HBARNAMEDE; <\/p>\n\n\n\n 5271 Say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza Muhakemesi Kanunu’nun 160<\/a>.\nmaddesinde yer alan \u201cCumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131, ihbar veya ba\u015fka bir suretle bir su\u00e7un\ni\u015flendi\u011fi izlenimini veren bir h\u00e2li \u00f6\u011frenir \u00f6\u011frenmez kamu davas\u0131n\u0131 a\u00e7maya yer\nolup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar vermek \u00fczere hemen i\u015fin ger\u00e7e\u011fini ara\u015ft\u0131rmaya ba\u015flar.\nCumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131, madd\u00ee ger\u00e7e\u011fin ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 ve adil bir yarg\u0131laman\u0131n\nyap\u0131labilmesi i\u00e7in, emrindeki adl\u00ee kolluk g\u00f6revlileri marifetiyle, \u015f\u00fcphelinin\nlehine ve aleyhine olan delilleri toplayarak muhafaza alt\u0131na almakla ve\n\u015f\u00fcphelinin haklar\u0131n\u0131 korumakla y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcd\u00fcr.\u201d \u015feklindeki d\u00fczenleme kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda,\nCumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n soru\u015fturma yapmak zorunda oldu\u011fu, <\/p>\n\n\n\n Bu kapsamda Yemek Sepeti Elektronik \u0130leti\u015fim Tan\u0131t\u0131m\nPazarlama G\u0131da Sanayi ve Ticaret A.\u015e.’ye yaz\u0131 yaz\u0131larak m\u00fc\u015ftekiye ait ekstrede\nbelirtilen ve www.yemeksepeti.com adl\u0131 internet sitesinden yap\u0131lan\nal\u0131\u015fveri\u015flerin kim taraf\u0131ndan ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirildi\u011fi tespit edilmeden, keza Garanti\nBankas\u0131 A.\u015e. Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne yaz\u0131 yaz\u0131larak su\u00e7a konu harcamalara ve bu\nharcamalar hakk\u0131nda yap\u0131lan ba\u015fvurular\u0131n sonucuna dair t\u00fcm belge ve evraklar\ntemin edilmeden ve s\u00f6z konusu r\u0131za d\u0131\u015f\u0131 harcamalar\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirildi\u011finin\niddia edildi\u011fi \u015f\u00fcpheli …’a ait telefon hatt\u0131na dair g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme d\u00f6k\u00fcmleri getirtilmeden,\neksik soru\u015fturmaya dayal\u0131 kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair karar verildi\u011fi\ndikkate al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, ortada 5271 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’a uygun bir soru\u015fturman\u0131n\nbulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 bir durumda, an\u0131lan Kanun’un 160<\/a>.\nmaddesi ve di\u011fer maddeleri uyar\u0131nca soru\u015fturma yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flamak maksad\u0131yla\nitiraz\u0131n kabul edilmesi gerekti\u011fi g\u00f6zetilmeden, yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde reddine karar\nverilmesinde isabet g\u00f6r\u00fclmedi\u011finden an\u0131lan karar\u0131n bozulmas\u0131 gerekti\u011finin ihbar\nolundu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. <\/p>\n\n\n\n GERE\u011e\u0130 G\u00d6R\u00dc\u015e\u00dcL\u00dcP D\u00dc\u015e\u00dcN\u00dcLD\u00dc: <\/p>\n\n\n\n KARAR : <\/strong>5271 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 160<\/a>.\nmaddesi uyar\u0131nca, bir su\u00e7un i\u015flendi\u011fi ihbar\u0131n\u0131 alan Cumhuriyet Savc\u0131s\u0131, delil\ntoplay\u0131p maddi ger\u00e7e\u011fi ara\u015ft\u0131rmaya ba\u015flayarak, su\u00e7un i\u015flendi\u011fi hususunda\nyeterli \u015f\u00fcphe bulunmas\u0131 halinde, ayn\u0131 Kanun’un 170\/2. maddesi uyar\u0131nca\niddianame d\u00fczenleyip kamu davas\u0131n\u0131 a\u00e7makla, yeterli \u015f\u00fcphe bulunmamas\u0131 halinde\nise Kanun’un 172. maddesi uyar\u0131nca kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar vermekle\ng\u00f6revli bulunmaktad\u0131r. <\/p>\n\n\n\n SONU\u00c7 : <\/strong>\u0130nceleme konusu dosyada, Cumhuriyet Savc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nca, \u015f\u00fcpheli\nve tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n ifadesinin al\u0131nmas\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda soru\u015fturma yap\u0131lmaks\u0131z\u0131n ve Yemek Sepeti\nElektronik \u0130leti\u015fim Tan\u0131t\u0131m Pazarlama G\u0131da Sanayi ve Ticaret A.\u015e.’ye yaz\u0131\nyaz\u0131larak m\u00fc\u015ftekiye ait ekstrede belirtilen ve www.yemeksepeti.com adl\u0131\ninternet sitesinden yap\u0131lan al\u0131\u015fveri\u015flerin kim taraf\u0131ndan ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirildi\u011fi\ntespit edilmeden, keza Garanti Bankas\u0131 A.\u015e. Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne yaz\u0131 yaz\u0131larak\nsu\u00e7a konu harcamalara ve bu harcamalar hakk\u0131nda yap\u0131lan ba\u015fvurular\u0131n sonucuna\ndair t\u00fcm belge ve evraklar temin edilmeden ve s\u00f6z konusu r\u0131za d\u0131\u015f\u0131 harcamalar\u0131n\nger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirildi\u011finin iddia edildi\u011fi \u015f\u00fcpheli …’a ait telefon hatt\u0131na dair\ng\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fme d\u00f6k\u00fcmleri getirtilmeden, an\u0131lan eksiklikler yap\u0131ld\u0131ktan sonra sonucuna\ng\u00f6re \u015f\u00fcphelinin hukuki durumunun de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekti\u011fi g\u00f6zetilmeden,\neksik soru\u015fturma ile kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar verilmesi kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda,\nKanun’un \u00f6ng\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc \u015fekilde soru\u015fturma yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n sa\u011flanmas\u0131 i\u00e7in itiraz\nmerciince itiraz\u0131n kabul\u00fcne karar verilmesi gerekirken, reddine karar verilmesi\nsebebiyle kanun yarar\u0131na bozma istemi yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden, Eski\u015fehir 2. Sulh\nCeza Hakimli\u011fince kesin olarak verilen 20\/02\/2017 g\u00fcn ve 2017\/841 De\u011fi\u015fik \u0130\u015f\nsay\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n, 5271 Say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza Muhakemesi Kanunu’nun 309<\/a>.\nmaddesinin 3. f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca BOZULMASINA, ayn\u0131 maddenin 4. f\u0131kra (a) bendi\nuyar\u0131nca sonraki i\u015flemlerin itiraz merciince yerine getirilmesine, 18\/01\/2018\ntarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Avukat Dr. \u015eaban Cankat TA\u015eKIN-Bursa Barosu<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Bili\u015fim hukuku ve ceza hukuku alan\u0131nda bir karar\u0131 payla\u015f\u0131yorum Kaynak: http:\/\/www.kazanci.com\/kho2\/ibb\/giris.htm YARGITAY 13. CEZA DA\u0130RES\u0130 E. 2017\/6445 K. 2018\/947 T. 18.1.2018 DAVA : Bili\u015fim sistemleri banka veya kredi kurumlar\u0131n\u0131n ara\u00e7 olarak kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 suretiyle doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k, bili\u015fim sistemlerinin kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 suretiyle h\u0131rs\u0131zl\u0131k ve ba\u015fkas\u0131na … Okumaya devam et