Bili\u015fim hukuku alan\u0131nda bir karar\u0131 payla\u015f\u0131yorum<\/p>\n\n\n\n
T\u00dcRK M\u0130LLET\u0130 ADINA
\n T.C.
\n BURSA
\n 1. ASL\u0130YE T\u0130CARET MAHKEMES\u0130
\nGEREK\u00c7EL\u0130 KARAR
\nESAS NO : 2016\/494
\nKARAR NO : 2017\/346<\/p>\n\n\n\n
HAK\u0130M : \u2026\u2026\u2026\u2026\u2026 \u2026\u2026\u2026
\nKAT\u0130P : \u2026\u2026\u2026.. \u00e7\u00e7\u2026\u2026\u2026.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
DAVACI : \u0130\u2026 LTD \u015eT\u0130
\nVEK\u0130L\u0130 : Av. A\u2026\u2026\u2026\u2026\u2026. Osmangazi\/ BURSA
\nDAVALI : B\u2026\u2026\u2026.B\u0130LG\u0130SAYAR LTD \u015eT\u0130 – \u2026\u2026\u2026.Nil\u00fcfer\/ BURSA
\nVEK\u0130L\u0130 : Av. \u015eABAN CANKAT TA\u015eKIN – Gazc\u0131lar Cad. Petek Bozkaya \u0130\u015f Han\u0131 A Blok K:3 D:316 \u2026 Osmangazi\/ BURSA<\/p>\n\n\n\n
DAVA : Alacak (Eser S\u00f6zle\u015fmesinden Kaynaklanan)
\nDAVA TAR\u0130H\u0130 : 12\/04\/2016
\nKARAR TAR\u0130H\u0130 : 28\/03\/2017
\nGEREK\u00c7EL\u0130 KARAR
\nYAZILMA TAR\u0130H\u0130 : 20\/04\/2017<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Mahkememizde g\u00f6r\u00fclmekte olan Alacak (Eser S\u00f6zle\u015fmesinden Kaynaklanan) davas\u0131n\u0131n yap\u0131lan a\u00e7\u0131k yarg\u0131lamas\u0131 sonunda,
\nGERE\u011e\u0130 D\u00dc\u015e\u00dcN\u00dcLD\u00dc:
\nDAVA : Davac\u0131 vekili mahkememize verdi\u011fi dava dilek\u00e7esiyle; M\u00fcvekkikli \u015firket ile daval\u0131 \u015firket aras\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenmi\u015f olan S\u00f6zle\u015fme gere\u011fince Tiger Plus, Navigator, Lod ve \u2026\u2026. \u00d6zel Yaz\u0131l\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcvekkili \u015firkete 6 ay i\u00e7inde teslimi taahh\u00fct edilmi\u015f olmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen \u2026.. \u00d6zel Yaz\u0131l\u0131mlar\u0131n\u0131n bug\u00fcne de\u011fin m\u00fcvekkili \u015firkete teslim edilmedi\u011fini, m\u00fcvekkili \u015firketin s\u00f6z konusu s\u00f6zle\u015fmeye konu yaz\u0131l\u0131mlar\u0131 daha \u00f6nce kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 Muhasebe Program\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda i\u015f ak\u0131\u015f\u0131n\u0131 farkl\u0131 olarak ciddi bir fayda sa\u011flayaca\u011f\u0131 d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncesi ile yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, S\u00f6zle\u015fmenin ikinci sayfas\u0131 ile \u00d6zel yaz\u0131l\u0131mlar\u0131n ayr\u0131nt\u0131lar\u0131 ve bu yaz\u0131l\u0131mlar ile yap\u0131labilecek i\u015fler ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 olarak belirtilmi\u015f olup, s\u00f6zle\u015fme gere\u011fince m\u00fcvekkiline teslim edilecek programlar i\u00e7in Daval\u0131 taraf\u0131n 14\/03\/2012 g\u00fcn ve 23821 Nolu faturay\u0131 d\u00fczenlemi\u015f olup, fatura bedelinin m\u00fcvekkili taraf\u0131ndan \u00f6denmi\u015f oldu\u011fu, daval\u0131 taraf\u0131n ise m\u00fcvekkili i\u00e7in s\u00f6zle\u015fme yapmas\u0131 sebebi olan \u00f6zel yaz\u0131l\u0131mlar\u0131 m\u00fcvekkiline teslim etmedi\u011fi, m\u00fcvekkilinin bundan dolay\u0131 elde etmeyi umdu\u011fu fayday\u0131 sa\u011flayamay\u0131p ciddi bir zarara u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve bu program ile ayn\u0131 \u00f6zelliklere sahip ba\u015fka bir program\u0131 sat\u0131n almak zorunda kald\u0131\u011f\u0131, daval\u0131 tarafa bu konuyla ilgili Bursa 10. Noterli\u011finin 13\/01\/2016 g\u00fcn ve 001\u2026. Yevmiye nolu ihtarnamesinin \u00e7ekilerek Tebli\u011fden itibaren 7 g\u00fcnl\u00fck s\u00fcre i\u00e7erisinde yaz\u0131l\u0131m\u0131n teslim edilmedi\u011fi takdirde s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin Tek tarafl\u0131 ve Hakl\u0131 sebeple Fesih edilmi\u015f say\u0131laca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n bildirildi\u011fi halde Daval\u0131 \u015eirket\u00e7e verilen s\u00fcre i\u00e7erisinde yaz\u0131l\u0131mlar\u0131n m\u00fcvekkili \u015firkete Teslim edilmedi\u011fi, daval\u0131 taraf\u0131n Teslim konusundaki y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc yerine getirmeyip m\u00fcvekkilinin bu nedenle u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131 zararlar\u0131na ili\u015fkin dava haklar\u0131 sakl\u0131 tutularak \u015fimdilik \u2026. \u00d6zel Yaz\u0131l\u0131mlar\u0131 i\u00e7in daval\u0131 tarafa \u00f6dedi\u011fi bedel olan 19.865,00-TL’nin \u00f6deme tarihinden itibaren i\u015fleyecek Avans Faizi ile birlikte Daval\u0131dan al\u0131nmas\u0131na karar verilmesini talep ve dava etmi\u015ftir.
\nCEVAP :
\nDaval\u0131 vekili davaya cevap dilek\u00e7esi ile; Davaya konu olan yaz\u0131l\u0131m\u0131n davac\u0131ya eksiksiz olarak teslim edildi\u011fi, S\u00f6zle\u015fme gere\u011fince s\u00f6z konusu yaz\u0131l\u0131mlar\u0131n 6 ay i\u00e7inde Teslim edilmesi \u00f6n g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f olup, m\u00fcvekkili taraf\u0131ndan Taahh\u00fct edilen zamanda teslimin ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fi ve davac\u0131 taraf\u00e7a 19.685,00-TL s\u00f6zle\u015fme kapsam\u0131nda m\u00fcvekkiline \u00f6dendi\u011fi, s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin 13\/03\/2012 tarihli olup, s\u00f6zle\u015fme \u00f6ncesi taraflar\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmeler yaparak Programa Son \u015feklini verdikleri ve Davac\u0131 \u015firketin iste\u011fine g\u00f6re gerekli yaz\u0131l\u0131m uyarlamalar\u0131n\u0131n yap\u0131larak davac\u0131n\u0131n bu konuda yaz\u0131l\u0131 onay\u0131n\u0131n da al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131, daha sonras\u0131nda ise 09\/05\/2012 tarihli ve 24336 Say\u0131l\u0131 Servis Formundan da anla\u015f\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 \u00fczere davac\u0131 \u015firket yetkilisi T\u2026.. \u00c7\u2026. taraf\u0131ndan imzal\u0131 belge ile Ek i\u015flemler yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve Servis hizmeti verildi\u011fi, davac\u0131 taleplerinin bizzat davac\u0131n\u0131n Ofisinde tamamen ve eksiksiz olarak yerine getirildi\u011fi, 13\/03\/2012 g\u00fcn\u00fcnde Program\u0131n Davac\u0131 i\u015fyerinde G\u00f6rselleri ile birlikte uygumalar\u0131 olarak tan\u0131t\u0131larak programa onay verildi\u011fi, faturan\u0131n davac\u0131 yana teslim edilip davac\u0131 taraf\u00e7a faturan\u0131n imzaland\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve her iki taraf\u00e7a muhasebe kay\u0131tlar\u0131na i\u015flenerek bedelinin de o tarihte davac\u0131 taraf\u00e7a \u00f6dendi\u011fi bunun sonras\u0131nda bir kez de 2805\/2012 tarihinde Servis Hizmeti verildi\u011fi, yine 31\/05\/2012 tarihinde servis hizmetinin verildi\u011fi an\u0131lan tarihten sonra ise aradan 4 y\u0131l ge\u00e7mi\u015f olup, davac\u0131 taraf\u0131n BK 194 ve Devam\u0131 maddeleri gere\u011fi ve 67-62 TTK 25\/3. Maddesi gere\u011fi Davac\u0131 taraf\u0131n herhangi bir ay\u0131p bildiriminde bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 halde ve m\u00fcvekkiline b\u00f6yle bir bildirim yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 halde program\u0131n kendilerine teslim edilmedi\u011finden bahisle a\u00e7t\u0131klar\u0131 bu davan\u0131n yerinde olmay\u0131p K\u00f6t\u00fc niyetli olduklar\u0131nda gerekir ise bu konularda Ticari Defter ve Kay\u0131tlar\u0131n incelenmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olup gerekli olur ise Tan\u0131k da dinletebileceklerinden yerinde olmayan davan\u0131n Reddine karar verilmesini talep ve beyan etmi\u015ftir.
\nHUKUK\u0130 N\u0130TELEND\u0130RME, DEL\u0130LLER VE GEREK\u00c7E;
\nDava, Davac\u0131 i\u00e7in \u00dcretilen \u00d6zel Yaz\u0131l\u0131m Program\u0131n\u0131n Davac\u0131 yana Teslim edilmedi\u011fi nedeniyle Daval\u0131 tarafa S\u00f6zle\u015fme ile \u00f6denen bedelin \u0130adesi i\u00e7in a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015f bir Tazminat Talebine ili\u015fkindir.
\nTaraflar aras\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenen 13\/03\/2012 tarihli Sat\u0131\u015f S\u00f6zle\u015fmesi Kapsam\u0131nda Daval\u0131ya \u00f6zel olarak haz\u0131rlanan ve yine S\u00f6zle\u015fme kapsam\u0131nda Paket olarak haz\u0131rlanan yaz\u0131l\u0131mlar\u0131n davac\u0131 i\u00e7in haz\u0131rlan\u0131p d\u00fczenlenmi\u015f bir S\u00f6zle\u015fme olup Sat\u0131\u015f ve Eser S\u00f6zle\u015fmelerini bir arada i\u00e7erdi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lmaktad\u0131r.
\nDaval\u0131 taraf\u00e7a sat\u0131lan \u00fcr\u00fcnler kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda davac\u0131 yana 14\/03\/2012 tarih ve 230821 Nolu KDV dahil 44.840,00-TYL toplam tutarl\u0131 \u0130rsaliyenin d\u00fczenlendi\u011fi, \u00fcr\u00fcnlerin davac\u0131 yana teslim edildi\u011fine dair \u0130rsaliyeli Faturan\u0131n sunuldu\u011fu ve davac\u0131 taraf\u00e7a bunun bedellerinin \u00f6dendi\u011fi, taraflar aras\u0131nda ihtilafs\u0131z olarak davac\u0131 taraf her ne kadar S\u00f6zle\u015fme, Fatura ve \u00d6deme tarihinden 4 y\u0131l kadar sonra 12\/04\/2016 tarihli a\u00e7m\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu i\u015f bu dava ile \u2026. \u00d6zel Yaz\u0131l\u0131m Program\u0131n\u0131n kendilerine teslim edilmedi\u011fi nedeniyle bu programa ili\u015fkin olarak \u00f6denen KDV Dahil 19.865,00-TL. Nin kendisine iadesi talep olunmu\u015f ise de, aradan ge\u00e7en s\u00fcreye nazaran davac\u0131 yan\u0131n ilk kez Daval\u0131 tarafa \u00e7ekti\u011fi Bursa 10. Noterli\u011finin 13\/01\/2016 tarih ve 0\u2026 Yevmiye Nolu ihtarnamesi \u00f6ncesinde herhangi bir ay\u0131p yada eksik \u0130fa y\u00f6n\u00fcnde bildirimde bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi, s\u00f6zle\u015fme tarihi sonras\u0131nda sat\u0131lan programlar ile ilgili servis hizmeti ald\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair tutanaklar\u0131n da daval\u0131 taraf\u00e7a dosya i\u00e7erisine ibraz edildi\u011fi, davac\u0131 taraf\u00e7a her ne kadar \u2026. \u00d6zel Yaz\u0131l\u0131m Program\u0131n\u0131 kendilerine teslim edilmedi\u011fi iddia olunmu\u015f ise de daval\u0131 taraf\u00e7a d\u00fczenlenen Faturan\u0131n kabul edilerek \u0130tiraz edilmedi\u011fi, bedelinin \u00f6dendi\u011fi, 6762 Say\u0131l\u0131 TTK 25\/3. Maddesi uyar\u0131nca tacir olan davac\u0131n\u0131n basiretli tacir h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine g\u00f6re ay\u0131p ihbar\u0131n\u0131 kanunen belirlenmi\u015f s\u00fcreler i\u00e7inde yapmay\u0131p aradan ge\u00e7en 4 y\u0131ll\u0131k s\u00fcre sonras\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131lan davan\u0131n d\u00fcr\u00fcstl\u00fck kurallar\u0131 ile ba\u011fda\u015fmayaca\u011f\u0131, davan\u0131n bu nedenle ispat edilemedi\u011finden tamamlanan sat\u0131\u015f i\u015flemi sonras\u0131nda yap\u0131lan \u00f6deme ile taraflar\u0131n 4 y\u0131l \u00f6ncesinde kapat\u0131lan Cari hesap ili\u015fkisine dayal\u0131 alacak talebinde de bulunamayaca\u011f\u0131ndan yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclmeyen davan\u0131n reddine karar vermek gerekmi\u015ftir.
\nH\u00dcK\u00dcM:Ayr\u0131nt\u0131s\u0131 ve yasal gerek\u00e7esi yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131kland\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00fczere;
\n1 – Davan\u0131n REDD\u0130NE,
\n2- Al\u0131nmas\u0131 gereken 31,40-TL maktu har\u00e7\u0131n pe\u015fin al\u0131nan 339,25-TL har\u00e7tan mahsubu ile bakiye 307,85-TL harc\u0131n karar kesinle\u015fti\u011finde ve talep halinde davac\u0131 tarafa \u0130ADES\u0130NE,
\n3-Daval\u0131 kendisini vekil ile temsil ettirdi\u011finden karar tarihi itibariyle y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte bulunan Avukatl\u0131k Asgari \u00dccret Tarifesi uyar\u0131nca Hesap ve Takdir olunan 2.383,80-TLVekalet \u00fccretinin davac\u0131dan al\u0131n\u0131p daval\u0131ya VER\u0130LMES\u0130NE,
\n4-Davac\u0131 taraf\u00e7a yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama giderlerinin kendisi \u00fczerinde BIRAKILMASINA,
\n5-Taraflarca yat\u0131r\u0131lan gider avans\u0131ndan kullan\u0131lmayan k\u0131sm\u0131n h\u00fckm\u00fcn kesinle\u015fmesinden sonra 6100 say\u0131l\u0131 HMK’nun 333. Maddesi uyar\u0131nca taraflara \u0130ADES\u0130NE,
\nDair davac\u0131 vekili ile daval\u0131 vekilinin y\u00fcz\u00fcnde karar\u0131n tebli\u011finden itibaren 2 haftal\u0131k s\u00fcre i\u00e7inde \u0130stinaf Yarg\u0131 yolu a\u00e7\u0131k olmak \u00fczere verilen karar a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a okunup usulen anlat\u0131ld\u0131. 28\/03\/2017<\/p>\n\n\n\n
TC \u0130STANBUL B\u00d6LGE ADL\u0130YE MAHKEMES\u0130
15.HUKUK DA\u0130RES\u0130 <\/p>\n\n\n\n
DOSYA NO : 2017\/1241
\nKARAR NO : 2018\/1559<\/p>\n\n\n\n
T\u00dcRK M\u0130LLET\u0130 ADINA
\nB\u00d6LGE ADL\u0130YE MAHKEMES\u0130 KARARI<\/p>\n\n\n\n
BA\u015eKAN : Z\u2026\u2026\u2026\u2026.. (\u2026\u2026..
\n\u00dcYE : D\u2026\u2026\u2026\u2026\u2026
\n\u00dcYE : A\u2026\u2026\u2026\u2026\u2026..
\nKAT\u0130P : S\u2026\u2026\u2026\u2026\u2026<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u0130NCELENEN KARARIN
\nMAHKEMES\u0130 : BURSA 1. ASL\u0130YE T\u0130CARET MAHKEMES\u0130
\nTAR\u0130H\u0130 : 28\/03\/2017
\nNUMARASI : 2016\/494 Esas, 2017\/346 Karar,<\/p>\n\n\n\n
DAVACI : \u0130\u2026\u2026\u2026\u2026. LTD \u015eT\u0130.
\nVEK\u0130L\u0130 : Av. A\u2026\u2026\u2026\u2026.. Osmangazi\/ BURSA<\/p>\n\n\n\n
DAVALI : B\u2026\u2026\u2026 B\u0130LG\u0130SAYAR\u2026. LTD \u015eT\u0130.
\nVEK\u0130L\u0130 : Av. \u015eABAN CANKAT TA\u015eKIN- Gazc\u0131lar Cad. Petek Bozkaya \u0130\u015f
\n Han\u0131 A Blok K:3 D:316 Osmangazi\/ BURSA<\/p>\n\n\n\n
DAVANIN KONUSU : Alacak <\/p>\n\n\n\n
KARAR TAR\u0130H\u0130 : 27\/11\/2018
\nKARARIN YAZILDI\u011eI
\nTAR\u0130H : 05\/12\/2018<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Taraflar aras\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fclen davan\u0131n yerel mahkemece yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lamas\u0131 sonucunda verilen h\u00fckme kar\u015f\u0131 istinaf yoluna ba\u015fvurulmu\u015f olup, duru\u015fmas\u0131z olarak dosya \u00fczerinde yap\u0131lan inceleme ve istinaf talepleriyle s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 olarak yap\u0131lan de\u011ferlendirme sonunda;
\nGERE\u011e\u0130 G\u00d6R\u00dc\u015e\u00dcL\u00dcP D\u00dc\u015e\u00dcN\u00dcLD\u00dc :
\nDavac\u0131 vekili, taraflar aras\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenen s\u00f6zle\u015fme gere\u011fi Tiger Plus, Navigator, Lod ve \u2026 \u00d6zel Yaz\u0131l\u0131m\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fcvekkili \u015firkete 6 ay i\u00e7inde teslimi taahh\u00fct edilmi\u015f olmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen \u2026. \u00d6zel Yaz\u0131l\u0131mlar\u0131n\u0131n bug\u00fcne kadar teslim edilmedi\u011fini, m\u00fcvekkilinin s\u00f6zle\u015fmeyi \u00f6nceden kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 programdan daha fazla fayda sa\u011flayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnerek imzalad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin 2. safyas\u0131nda \u00f6zel yaz\u0131l\u0131mlarla yap\u0131labilecek i\u015flerin ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 olarak g\u00f6sterildi\u011fini, teslim edilecek programlar i\u00e7in daval\u0131n\u0131n 14\/03\/2012 tarihli fatura d\u00fczenledi\u011fini, fatura bedelinin m\u00fcvekkili taraf\u0131ndan \u00f6dendi\u011fini, ancak daval\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6zel yaz\u0131l\u0131mlar\u0131 teslim etmedi\u011fini, 13\/01\/2016 tarihli ihtarla \u2026. \u00f6zel program\u0131n\u0131n teslimini istemesine ra\u011fmen teslim edilmedi\u011fini, teslimi ispat y\u00fck\u00fcn\u00fcn daval\u0131da oldu\u011funu, teslim edilmedi\u011fi i\u00e7in m\u00fcvekkilinin muhasebe program\u0131n\u0131 ve ihtiyac\u0131na \u00f6zel yaz\u0131l\u0131mlar\u0131 ba\u015fka bir firmadan sa\u011flad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek, fazlaya ili\u015fkin haklar\u0131 sakl\u0131 tutarak s\u00f6zle\u015fmede yer alan \u2026\u2026. \u00f6zel yaz\u0131l\u0131mlar\u0131 i\u00e7in daval\u0131ya \u00f6denen 19.865,00 TL’nin daval\u0131dan \u00f6deme tarihinden itibaren i\u015fleyecek avans faiziyle birlikte tahsiline karar verilmesini talep ve dava etmi\u015ftir.
\nDaval\u0131 vekili, dava konusu yaz\u0131l\u0131m\u0131n davac\u0131ya eksiksiz olarak ve s\u00fcresinde teslim edildi\u011fini, s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin son k\u0131sm\u0131nda belirtildi\u011fi \u00fczere \u00f6n g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmeler s\u0131ras\u0131nda sunum yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve programa son \u015feklinin verildi\u011fini, buna ili\u015fkin servis formlar\u0131 d\u00fczenlendi\u011fini, davac\u0131 taleplerine g\u00f6re yaz\u0131l\u0131m uyarlamalar\u0131 yap\u0131larak davac\u0131n\u0131n yaz\u0131l\u0131 onay\u0131n\u0131n al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, s\u00f6zle\u015fmenin bu onaydan sonra imzaland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve ard\u0131ndan 14\/03\/2012 tarihli faturan\u0131n davac\u0131ya teslim edildi\u011fini, davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan fatura bedelinin \u00f6dendi\u011fini ve resmi kay\u0131tlar\u0131na girdi\u011fini, taraflar\u0131n 13\/03\/2012 tarihi itibariyle programda eksiklik bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 hususunda mutab\u0131k kald\u0131ktan sonra program\u0131n davac\u0131ya teslim edildi\u011fini, daval\u0131n\u0131n sonras\u0131nda da sat\u0131\u015f sonras\u0131 destek hizmetlerini s\u00fcrd\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc, davac\u0131n\u0131n programda var oldu\u011funu iddia etti\u011fi ay\u0131plar\u0131 m\u00fcvekkiline derhal bildirmedi\u011fini, uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n yaz\u0131l\u0131m\u0131n ay\u0131pl\u0131 olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan kaynakland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ay\u0131p ihbar\u0131n\u0131n s\u00fcresinde yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, daval\u0131n\u0131n 4 y\u0131l bekledikten sonra 13\/01\/2016 tarihli ihtarla ay\u0131p ihbar\u0131 yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu s\u00fcrenin \u00e7ok uzun oldu\u011funu, m\u00fcvekkilinin eksiksiz ve tam olarak teslim etti\u011fini belirterek, davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmesini istemi\u015ftir.
\nMahkemece, \u00fcr\u00fcnlerin davac\u0131 yana teslim edildi\u011fine dair irsaliyeli faturan\u0131n sunuldu\u011fu, bedelinin \u00f6dendi\u011fi, davac\u0131 taraf\u00e7a \u00f6zel yaz\u0131l\u0131mlar\u0131n kendisine teslim edilmedi\u011fi iddia edilmi\u015f ise de, aradan ge\u00e7en s\u00fcreye nazaran davac\u0131 yan\u0131n ilk kez daval\u0131 tarafa g\u00f6nderdi\u011fi 13\/01\/2016 tarihli ihtar \u00f6ncesinde herhangi bir ay\u0131p yada eksik ifa y\u00f6n\u00fcnde bildirimde bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi, s\u00f6zle\u015fme tarihi sonras\u0131nda sat\u0131lan programlar ile ilgili servis hizmeti ald\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair tutanaklar\u0131n da daval\u0131 taraf\u00e7a dosya i\u00e7erisine ibraz edildi\u011fi, ay\u0131p ihbar\u0131n\u0131n s\u00fcresinde yap\u0131lmay\u0131p 4 y\u0131ll\u0131k s\u00fcre sonras\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131lan davan\u0131n d\u00fcr\u00fcstl\u00fck kurallar\u0131 ile ba\u011fda\u015fmayaca\u011f\u0131, davan\u0131n bu nedenle ispat edilemedi\u011finden tamamlanan sat\u0131\u015f i\u015flemi sonras\u0131nda yap\u0131lan \u00f6deme ile taraflar\u0131n 4 y\u0131l \u00f6ncesinde kapat\u0131lan cari hesap ili\u015fkisine dayal\u0131 alacak talebinde de bulunamayaca\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7eleriyle davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir.
\nDavac\u0131 vekili istinaf dilek\u00e7esinde, \u00f6zel yaz\u0131l\u0131mlar\u0131n teslim edildi\u011finin ispat y\u00fck\u00fcn\u00fcn daval\u0131da oldu\u011funu, bu yaz\u0131l\u0131mlar halen teslim edilmedi\u011finden ay\u0131p ihbar\u0131 yap\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131, daval\u0131n\u0131n yaz\u0131l\u0131m\u0131 olu\u015fturmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan dosyaya sunamad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, faturaya itiraz edilmemesinin faturadaki yaz\u0131l\u0131mlar\u0131n m\u00fcvekkilince kabul edildi\u011fi \u015feklinde gerek\u00e7eli kararda yorumlanmas\u0131n\u0131n do\u011fru olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bilgisayarlar \u00fczerinde bilirki\u015fi incelemesi yapt\u0131r\u0131lmaks\u0131z\u0131n karar verilmesinin adil yarg\u0131lanma hakk\u0131na ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011funu belirterek, yerel mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131larak davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcne karar verilmesini istemi\u015ftir.
\nTaraflar aras\u0131nda d\u00fczenlenen 13\/03\/2012 tarihli s\u00f6zle\u015fme ile, Tiger Plus isimli haz\u0131r program\u0131n sat\u0131\u015f\u0131 ve \u2026. \u00f6zel yaz\u0131l\u0131mlar\u0131n\u0131n haz\u0131rlanarak teslimi kararla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k konusu \u2026\u2026. \u00d6zel Yaz\u0131l\u0131mlar\u0131n\u0131n yap\u0131m\u0131na ili\u015fkin s\u00f6zle\u015fme, niteli\u011fince bir eser s\u00f6zle\u015fmesidir. Davac\u0131 i\u015f sahibi; daval\u0131 ise y\u00fcklenicidir.
\nDaval\u0131 y\u00fcklenici taraf\u0131ndan davac\u0131 ad\u0131na d\u00fczenlenen 14\/03\/2012 tarihli KDV dahil 44.840,00 TL bedelli “Tiger Plus, Tiger Plus kullan\u0131c\u0131lar\u0131 + 10, Tiger Plus navigator, Tiger Plus Lod, \u00d6zel Yaz\u0131l\u0131m” a\u00e7\u0131klamal\u0131 irsaliyeli fatura davac\u0131ya tebli\u011f edilmi\u015ftir. \u0130rsaliyeli fatura ayn\u0131 zamanda \u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fcn teslim edildi\u011fini de g\u00f6steren belge niteli\u011findedir. Daval\u0131ya teslim edilen irsaliyeli faturan\u0131n alt k\u0131sm\u0131ndaki “Eksiksiz Teslim Alan” b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnde fatura i\u00e7eri\u011finin teslim al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair imza bulundu\u011fu ve bu imzaya itiraz edilmedi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Davac\u0131 taraf fatura i\u00e7eri\u011findeki \u2026\u2026 \u00d6zel Yaz\u0131l\u0131mlar\u0131n\u0131 teslim almad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair ihtarnameyi 13\/01\/2016 tarihinde daval\u0131ya g\u00f6ndermi\u015ftir. Daval\u0131 ise 10\/02\/2016 tarihli cevabi ihtar\u0131nda s\u00f6zle\u015fme konusu t\u00fcm yaz\u0131l\u0131mlar\u0131n davac\u0131 bilgisayarlar\u0131na eksiksiz kurularak, e\u011fitimleri verilip, \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131r vaziyette teslim edildi\u011fi, buna ili\u015fkin servis formlar\u0131 d\u00fczenlendi\u011fi, aradan ge\u00e7en 4 sene boyunca ay\u0131p, ar\u0131za, eksik ihbar\u0131 yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 bildirmi\u015ftir.
\n\u00d6te yandan, davac\u0131 taraf\u00e7a daval\u0131ya g\u00f6nderilen 16\/09\/2013 tarihli yaz\u0131da, 22\/11\/2012 tarihinden itibaren yap\u0131lan i\u015fler i\u00e7in daval\u0131 \u015firket y\u00f6netici ve \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131na te\u015fekk\u00fcr edildi\u011fi bildirilmi\u015ftir.
\nSomut olayda, davac\u0131 i\u015f sahibi taraf\u0131ndan s\u00f6zle\u015fme gere\u011fi teslimi gereken \u2026\u2026 \u00f6zel yaz\u0131l\u0131mlar\u0131n\u0131n teslim edilmedi\u011fi belirtilerek, \u00f6zel yaz\u0131l\u0131mlar i\u00e7in daval\u0131ya \u00f6denen 19.865,00 TL’nin daval\u0131dan \u00f6deme tarihinden itibaren i\u015fleyecek avans faiziyle birlikte tahsiline karar verilmesi istenmi\u015f, daval\u0131 ise yaz\u0131l\u0131mlar\u0131n irsaliyeli fatura ile teslim edildi\u011fini ve aradan ge\u00e7en 4 y\u0131lda ay\u0131p ve eksik ihbar\u0131 yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 bildirerek davan\u0131n reddini istemi\u015ftir. Dosya kapsam\u0131ndaki irsaliyeli fatura i\u00e7eri\u011finden dava konusu \u2026\u2026 yaz\u0131l\u0131mlar\u0131n\u0131n davac\u0131ya teslim edildi\u011fi, irsaliyeli faturada teslim alan imzas\u0131 bulundu\u011fu, imzan\u0131n inkar edilmedi\u011fi, aradan ge\u00e7en uzun s\u00fcre zarf\u0131nda eksik i\u015f iddias\u0131nda bulunulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, ayr\u0131ca davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan da 16\/09\/2013 tarihli yaz\u0131 ile daval\u0131 \u015firket y\u00f6netici ve \u00e7al\u0131\u015fanlar\u0131na te\u015fekk\u00fcr edildi\u011fi hususlar\u0131 bir arada de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde, yerel mahkemece davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmesi yerinde olmu\u015ftur.
\nA\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerle, yerel mahkeme karar\u0131 usul ve yasaya uygun bulundu\u011fundan, davac\u0131 vekilinin istinaf talebinin esastan reddine karar verilmi\u015ftir. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
H\u00dcK\u00dcM: Gerek\u00e7esi a\u00e7\u0131kland\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00fczere;
\n1-Bursa 1. Asliye Ticaret Mahkemesi’nin 28\/03\/2017 tarih ve 2016\/494 Esas, 2017\/346 Karar say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131nda usul ve esas y\u00f6n\u00fcnden yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131 bir durum bulunmamas\u0131na g\u00f6re, davac\u0131 vekilinin istinaf ba\u015fvurusunun HMK’n\u0131n 353\/1-b-1 maddesi gere\u011fince esastan REDD\u0130NE,
\n2-Al\u0131nmas\u0131 gereken 35,90-TL istinaf karar harc\u0131ndan pe\u015fin al\u0131nan 31,40-TL’nin mahsubu ile bakiye 4,50-TL istinaf karar harc\u0131n\u0131n davac\u0131dan al\u0131narak HAZ\u0130NEYE GEL\u0130R KAYDINA,
\n3-Davac\u0131 taraf\u00e7a yap\u0131lan istinaf yarg\u0131lama giderlerinin \u00fczerinde b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131na,
\n4-\u0130stinaf incelemesi s\u0131ras\u0131nda duru\u015fma a\u00e7\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan daval\u0131 yarar\u0131na vek\u00e2let \u00fccreti takdirine yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na,
\nDosya \u00fczerinden yap\u0131lan inceleme sonucunda, HMK’n\u0131n 362\/1-a maddesi gere\u011fince KES\u0130N olmak \u00fczere 27\/11\/2018 tarihinde oybirli\u011fi ile karar verildi. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
Ba\u015fkan 3\u2026.
\n e-imzal\u0131d\u0131r
\n\u00dcye 3\u2026.
\ne-imzal\u0131d\u0131r
\n\u00dcye 4\u2026\u2026
\ne-imzal\u0131d\u0131r
\nKatip 1\u2026.
\ne-imzal\u0131d\u0131r <\/p>\n\n\n\n
Avukat Dr. \u015eaban Cankat TA\u015eKIN-Bursa Barosu<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Bili\u015fim hukuku alan\u0131nda bir karar\u0131 payla\u015f\u0131yorum T\u00dcRK M\u0130LLET\u0130 ADINA T.C. BURSA 1. ASL\u0130YE T\u0130CARET MAHKEMES\u0130 GEREK\u00c7EL\u0130 KARAR ESAS NO : 2016\/494 KARAR NO : 2017\/346 HAK\u0130M : \u2026\u2026\u2026\u2026\u2026 \u2026\u2026\u2026 KAT\u0130P : \u2026\u2026\u2026.. \u00e7\u00e7\u2026\u2026\u2026. DAVACI : \u0130\u2026 LTD \u015eT\u0130 VEK\u0130L\u0130 : … Okumaya devam et