Bili\u015fim hukuku ve ceza hukuku alan\u0131nda bir karar\u0131 payla\u015f\u0131yorum<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Kaynak:\u00a0http:\/\/www.kazanci.com\/kho2\/ibb\/giris.htm<\/p>\n\n\n\n
YARGITAY<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n 13. CEZA DA\u0130RES\u0130<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n E. 2015\/15567<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n K. 2017\/3907<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n T. 11.4.2017<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n DAVA : <\/strong>Mahalli mahkemece verilen h\u00fck\u00fcmler\ntemyiz edilmekle dosya incelenerek, gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc: <\/p>\n\n\n\n KARAR : <\/strong>H\u00fckmolunan cezan\u0131n t\u00fcr ve s\u00fcresine\ng\u00f6re 5271 Say\u0131l\u0131 CMK’n\u0131n 299<\/a>\/1.\nmaddesi uyar\u0131nca san\u0131k …. m\u00fcdafiinin duru\u015fma isteminin reddine karar\nverilerek yap\u0131lan incelemede; <\/p>\n\n\n\n 1-)Olay\ng\u00fcn\u00fc, saat 14:14’de san\u0131klardan … ad\u0131na kay\u0131tl\u0131 … numaral\u0131 IP’den bireysel\ninternet \u015fubesine giri\u015f yap\u0131larak, saat 14:18’de kat\u0131lana ait … \u015eubesi’ndeki\ndolar hesab\u0131ndan 2900 USD sat\u0131\u015f\u0131n\u0131n yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, 4.060 TL’ye \u00e7evrilerek kat\u0131lan\u0131n\n…\u015eubesindeki hesab\u0131na aktar\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, saat 14:19’da kat\u0131lan\u0131n yine ayn\u0131 \u015fubedeki\nhesab\u0131ndan 139,91 TL’nin … \u015eubesi’ndeki hesab\u0131na aktar\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, 14:31’de …\n\u015eubesi’ndeki hesapta toplanan 5.250 TL’nin san\u0131klardan .. .. ad\u0131na olan…’ne\nhavale yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, ard\u0131ndan da ayn\u0131 g\u00fcn saat 14:38’de san\u0131k .. .. taraf\u0131ndan …nden\nnakit olarak \u00e7ekildi\u011fi olayda; san\u0131klar\u0131n eylemlerinin …’nun 17.11.2009 g\u00fcn\nve 193\/268 Say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131kland\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00fczere, 5237 Say\u0131l\u0131 TCK’n\u0131n 142<\/a>\/2-e\nmaddesinde d\u00fczenlenen “bili\u015fim sistemlerinin kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 suretiyle\nh\u0131rs\u0131zl\u0131k” su\u00e7unu olu\u015fturdu\u011fu g\u00f6zetilmeden yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde karar verilmesi,\n<\/p>\n\n\n\n 2-)Su\u00e7a konu\nparan\u0131n \u00f6nem ve de\u011feri ile meydana gelen zarar\u0131n a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131\u011f\u0131 dikkate al\u0131narak TCK’n\u0131n\n61<\/a>.\nmaddesi uyar\u0131nca, temel ceza belirlenirken alt s\u0131n\u0131rdan uzakla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131\ngerekti\u011finin g\u00f6zetilmemesi, <\/p>\n\n\n\n 3-)San\u0131k\n….’in savunmas\u0131nda; di\u011fer san\u0131klar\u0131 ve kat\u0131lan\u0131 tan\u0131mad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, olay yeri\nolan…’da hi\u00e7 ikamet etmedi\u011fini, …’nda veznedar olarak \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan dolay\u0131\nolay g\u00fcn\u00fc i\u015fyerinde oldu\u011funu, di\u011fer san\u0131klar taraf\u0131ndan evinde kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131\nbilgisayara ait IP numaras\u0131n\u0131n bir \u015fekilde tespit edilerek su\u00e7un i\u015flenmi\u015f\nolabilece\u011fini, kablosuz internet kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, ayr\u0131ca bankac\u0131 olmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen\ninternet bankac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 dahi kullanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yledi\u011finin anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda;\nsan\u0131\u011f\u0131n savunmas\u0131nda belirtti\u011fi hususlar\u0131n ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131; \u00f6zellikle de ad\u0131na kay\u0131tl\u0131\n… IP numaras\u0131n\u0131n ba\u011fl\u0131 oldu\u011fu bilgisayar ve modem ile dosyan\u0131n, b\u00fct\u00fcn\u00fcyle\nbili\u015fim su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan anlayan uzman bilirki\u015filere tevdi edilerek bilgisayara\nba\u011fl\u0131 modem t\u00fcrlerinin tespit edilmesi, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n beyan\u0131nda belirtti\u011fi \u00fczere\nmodem hatt\u0131n\u0131n kablosuz olmas\u0131 durumunda hatt\u0131n g\u00fcvenli\u011fi i\u00e7in gerekli\n\u00f6nlemlerin al\u0131n\u0131p al\u0131nmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, internet ba\u011flant\u0131s\u0131na d\u0131\u015far\u0131dan girilip\ngirilemeyece\u011fi, IP numaras\u0131n\u0131n de\u011fi\u015ftirilmesinin m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131,\nbilgisayarlara vir\u00fcs g\u00f6nderilerek bilgilerinin al\u0131n\u0131p al\u0131nmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 su\u00e7a konu\ni\u015flemin ne \u015fekilde nereden yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 konular\u0131nda bilirki\u015fi raporu al\u0131nd\u0131ktan\nsonra, t\u00fcm deliller \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde san\u0131k …’in hukuksal durumunun\nde\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekirken, eksik inceleme ile yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde karar\nverilmesi, <\/p>\n\n\n\n 4-)Anayasan\u0131n\n141. ve 5271 Say\u0131l\u0131 CMK’n\u0131n 34<\/a>,\n230 ve 289<\/a>\nmaddeleri uyar\u0131nca mahkeme kararlar\u0131n\u0131n denetimine imkan verecek \u015fekilde a\u00e7\u0131k\nve gerek\u00e7eli olmas\u0131, gerek\u00e7e b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnde mevcut delillerin tart\u0131\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131,\nde\u011ferlendirilmesi, reddedilen veya kan\u0131tlama y\u00f6n\u00fcnden \u00fcst\u00fcn tutulan delillerin\nneler oldu\u011fu ve nedenlerinin g\u00f6sterilmesi, delillerle sonu\u00e7 aras\u0131nda ba\u011f\nkurulmas\u0131, bir ba\u015fka deyi\u015fle eldeki delillerle neden bu sonuca var\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n\nanlat\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi, t\u00fcm bunlar\u0131n \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011f\u0131nda ula\u015f\u0131lan kanaat ve CMK’n\u0131n 230<\/a>.\nmaddesinde belirtilen di\u011fer unsurlar\u0131n bulunmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi g\u00f6zetilmeden;\nmahkemece, san\u0131klardan ….’\u0131n da mahkumiyetine karar verilmesine ra\u011fmen, san\u0131k\n… y\u00f6n\u00fcnden gerek\u00e7esiz h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131, <\/p>\n\n\n\n 5-)Anayasa\nMahkemesi’nin 08.10.2015 g\u00fcnl\u00fc, 2014\/140 Esas ve 2015\/85 Karar say\u0131l\u0131,\n24.11.2015 g\u00fcn ve 29542 Say\u0131l\u0131 Resmi Gazete’de yay\u0131mlanan k\u0131smi iptal karar\u0131\nuyar\u0131nca, 5237 Say\u0131l\u0131 TCK 53<\/a>.\nmadde 1<\/a>.\nf\u0131kra b bendinde d\u00fczenlenen \u201cse\u00e7me ve se\u00e7ilme ehliyetinden ve di\u011fer siyasi\nhaklar\u0131 kullanmaktan yoksun b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131na\u201d h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn iptal edilmesi sebebiyle\nuygulanamayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6zetilmesi zorunlulu\u011fu, <\/p>\n\n\n\n 6-)Yarg\u0131lama\ngiderlerinin her bir san\u0131\u011f\u0131n sebep oldu\u011fu tutar kadar ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 y\u00fckletilmesi\ngerekti\u011fi g\u00f6zetilmeden, san\u0131klardan \u201cm\u00fc\u015ftereken ve m\u00fcteselsilen\u201d al\u0131nmas\u0131na\nkarar verilmesi suretiyle 5271 Say\u0131l\u0131 CMK’n\u0131n 326<\/a>\/2.\nmaddesine ayk\u0131r\u0131 davran\u0131lmas\u0131, <\/p>\n\n\n\n SONU\u00c7 : <\/strong>Bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015f, san\u0131klar .. ..,\nile.. .. m\u00fcdafiilerinin temyiz istemleri bu bak\u0131mdan yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f\noldu\u011fundan, h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin a\u00e7\u0131klanan sebeplerle tebli\u011fnameye uygun olarak\nBOZULMASINA, 5320 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 8<\/a>\/1.\nmaddesi arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 ile 1412 Say\u0131l\u0131 CMUK’un 326\/son maddesi uyar\u0131nca san\u0131klar\u0131n\nkazan\u0131lm\u0131\u015f haklar\u0131n\u0131n korunmas\u0131na, bozma karar\u0131n\u0131n (1) numaral\u0131 bendinde yer\nalan bozma nedeninin, 5320 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 8<\/a>\/1.\nmaddesi yollamas\u0131yla 1412 CMUK’un 325. maddesi uyar\u0131nca, h\u00fckm\u00fc temyiz etmeyen\nh\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fc .. ..’in \u00fczerine at\u0131l\u0131 \u201cnitelikli doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k\u201d su\u00e7u y\u00f6n\u00fcnden, san\u0131k\n.. ..’e de S\u0130RAYET\u0130NE, 11.04.2017 g\u00fcn\u00fcnde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Avukat Dr. \u015eaban Cankat TA\u015eKIN-Bursa Barosu<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Bili\u015fim hukuku ve ceza hukuku alan\u0131nda bir karar\u0131 payla\u015f\u0131yorum Kaynak:\u00a0http:\/\/www.kazanci.com\/kho2\/ibb\/giris.htm YARGITAY 13. CEZA DA\u0130RES\u0130 E. 2015\/15567 K. 2017\/3907 T. 11.4.2017 DAVA : Mahalli mahkemece verilen h\u00fck\u00fcmler temyiz edilmekle dosya incelenerek, gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc: KARAR : H\u00fckmolunan cezan\u0131n t\u00fcr ve s\u00fcresine g\u00f6re … Okumaya devam et