Bili\u015fim hukuku alan\u0131nda bir karar\u0131 payla\u015f\u0131yorum<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Kaynak: http:\/\/www.kazanci.com\/kho2\/ibb\/giris.htmT<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n YARGITAY<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n 11. HUKUK DA\u0130RES\u0130<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n E. 2016\/10339<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n K. 2018\/2555<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n T. 10.4.2018<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n DAVA : <\/strong>Taraflar aras\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fclen davada …\n2. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi’nce verilen 08.06.2016 tarih ve 2015\/60-2016\/240\nSay\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n Yarg\u0131tayca incelenmesi daval\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan istenmi\u015f ve\ntemyiz dilek\u00e7esinin s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde verildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olmakla, dava dosyas\u0131\ni\u00e7in Tetkik Hakimi … taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen rapor dinlendikten ve yine dosya\ni\u00e7erisindeki dilek\u00e7e, layihalar, duru\u015fma tutanaklar\u0131 ve t\u00fcm belgeler okunup,\nincelendikten sonra i\u015fin gere\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcl\u00fcp, d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc: <\/p>\n\n\n\n KARAR : <\/strong>Davac\u0131 vekili, m\u00fcvekkilinin daval\u0131\nnezdindeki hesab\u0131nda bulunan 3.000,00 TL’nin internet bankac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 sistemi\nkullan\u0131lmas\u0131 suretiyle doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131lar taraf\u0131ndan … yap\u0131larak dava d\u0131\u015f\u0131\nKuveytt\u00fcrk Kat\u0131l\u0131m Bankas\u0131 nezdinde bulunan bir hesaba aktar\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, daval\u0131\nbankan\u0131n internet bankac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda g\u00fcvenli\u011fi sa\u011flama y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc yerine\ngetirmedi\u011fini, m\u00fcvekkilinin kredili mevduat hesab\u0131ndan \u00e7ekilen 3.000,00 TL’yi\nfaizi ile daval\u0131 bankaya \u00f6demek zorunda kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrerek 3.365,00 TL’nin\ntahsiline karar verilmesini istemi\u015ftir. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Daval\u0131\nvekili, zamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131 s\u00fcresinin 1 y\u0131l oldu\u011funu ve i\u015fbu davada alaca\u011f\u0131n\nzamana\u015f\u0131m\u0131na u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, m\u00fcvekkili banka taraf\u0131ndan sunulan internet\nbankac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda herhangi bir g\u00fcvenlik zafiyeti bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, internet\nbankac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 giri\u015fi i\u00e7in gerekli olan parola ve \u015fifrelerin korunmas\u0131n\u0131n m\u00fc\u015fteri\ny\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnde oldu\u011funu, bunlar\u0131n ele ge\u00e7irilmesi ya da kolayca tahmin edilmesi\nsonucu do\u011facak zararlardan bankan\u0131n sorumlu tutulamayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131, davan\u0131n ceza\ndosyas\u0131nda mahkumiyetine karar verilen Habip \u015eim\u015fek’e a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini\nsavunarak davan\u0131n reddine karar verilmesini istemi\u015ftir. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Mahkemece\nt\u00fcm dosya kapsam\u0131na g\u00f6re, …. 53. Asliye Ceza Mahkemesi’nin 2013\/264 Esas\nsay\u0131l\u0131 dosyas\u0131nda san\u0131k …’in bili\u015fim\nsistemlerinin kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 suretiyle h\u0131rs\u0131zl\u0131k<\/strong> fiilini\nger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirmesi neticesinde 2 y\u0131l 6 ay hapis cezas\u0131na mahkum edildi\u011fi,\n05\/07\/2011 tarihinde davac\u0131n\u0131n daval\u0131 banka kredili mevduat hesab\u0131ndan 3.000,00\nTL’nin dava d\u0131\u015f\u0131 Habip \u015eim\u015fek in hesab\u0131na usuls\u00fcz olarak havale edildi\u011fi,\nusuls\u00fcz i\u015flemle \u00e7ekilen paralar asl\u0131nda do\u011frudan do\u011fruya bankan\u0131n zarar\u0131\nniteli\u011finde oldu\u011fu, doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k eylemi m\u00fc\u015fteriye de\u011fil bankaya kar\u015f\u0131\nger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirildi\u011fi, banka taraf\u0131ndan mevduat sahibinin m\u00fcterafik kusurunun varl\u0131\u011f\u0131\nhalinde kusur oran\u0131 \u00fczerinden hesap sahibinden bu miktar\u0131 alaca\u011f\u0131ndan mahsup\nedebilece\u011fi, somut olayda, davac\u0131ya ait para, daval\u0131 bankaya kar\u015f\u0131\nger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilen sahtecilik i\u015flemi ile hesaptan bir ba\u015fka hesaba havale\nedildi\u011fi, daval\u0131 banka davac\u0131ya vermi\u015f oldu\u011fu \u015fifre ve parolan\u0131n davac\u0131n\u0131n\nkusuru ile ele ge\u00e7irildi\u011fini ispat edemedi\u011fi, bu halde bankan\u0131n t\u00fcm zarardan\nsorumlu oldu\u011fu, gerek\u00e7esi ile davan\u0131n k\u0131smen kabul\u00fcne ve 3.324,16 TL alaca\u011f\u0131n\ntahsiline karar verilmi\u015ftir. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Karar\u0131,\ndaval\u0131 vekili temyiz etmi\u015ftir. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Dava dosyas\u0131\ni\u00e7erisindeki bilgi ve belgelere, mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131n gerek\u00e7esinde dayan\u0131lan\ndelillerin tart\u0131\u015f\u0131l\u0131p, de\u011ferlendirilmesinde usul ve yasaya ayk\u0131r\u0131 bir y\u00f6n\nbulunmamas\u0131na g\u00f6re, daval\u0131 vekilinin t\u00fcm temyiz itirazlar\u0131 yerinde de\u011fildir. <\/p>\n\n\n\n SONU\u00c7 : <\/strong>Yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenlerden\ndolay\u0131, daval\u0131 vekilinin b\u00fct\u00fcn temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n reddiyle usul ve kanuna\nuygun bulunan h\u00fckm\u00fcn ONANMASINA, a\u015fa\u011f\u0131da yaz\u0131l\u0131 bakiye 170,07 TL temyiz ilam\nharc\u0131n\u0131n temyiz eden daval\u0131dan al\u0131nmas\u0131na, 10.04.2018 tarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle\nkarar verildi. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Avukat Dr. \u015eaban Cankat TA\u015eKIN-Bursa Barosu<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Bili\u015fim hukuku alan\u0131nda bir karar\u0131 payla\u015f\u0131yorum Kaynak: http:\/\/www.kazanci.com\/kho2\/ibb\/giris.htmT YARGITAY 11. HUKUK DA\u0130RES\u0130 E. 2016\/10339 K. 2018\/2555 T. 10.4.2018 DAVA : Taraflar aras\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fclen davada … 2. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi’nce verilen 08.06.2016 tarih ve 2015\/60-2016\/240 Say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n Yarg\u0131tayca incelenmesi daval\u0131 vekili taraf\u0131ndan … Okumaya devam et