Bili\u015fim hukuku ve ceza hukuku alan\u0131nda bir karar\u0131 payla\u015f\u0131yorum<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Kaynak:\u00a0http:\/\/www.kazanci.com\/kho2\/ibb\/giris.htm<\/p>\n\n\n\n
YARGITAY<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n 13. CEZA DA\u0130RES\u0130<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n E. 2017\/2134<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n K. 2017\/3321<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n T. 30.3.2017<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n DAVA : <\/strong>Resmi belgede sahtecilik ve bili\u015fim sistemlerinin kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 suretiyle\nh\u0131rs\u0131zl\u0131k<\/strong> su\u00e7undan \u015f\u00fcpheliler … … ve … … haklar\u0131nda yap\u0131lan\nsoru\u015fturma evresi sonunda … Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nca verilen 27\/07\/2015\ntarihli ve 2015\/38415 soru\u015fturma, 2015\/39392 Say\u0131l\u0131 kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na\ndair karara y\u00f6nelik itiraz\u0131n reddine dair mercii … Sulh Ceza Hakimli\u011finin\n02\/05\/2016 tarihli ve 2016\/1493 de\u011fi\u015fik i\u015f say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131, Adalet\nBakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131’n\u0131n 05.01.2017 g\u00fcn ve 94660652-105-35-13603-2016-Kyb say\u0131l\u0131 yaz\u0131s\u0131\nile kanun yarar\u0131na bozma ihbar\u0131nda bulunuldu\u011fundan … Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131’n\u0131n\n25.01.2017 g\u00fcn ve 2017\/3841 Say\u0131l\u0131 ihbarnamesiyle Dairemize g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi, <\/p>\n\n\n\n MEZKUR \u0130HBARNAMEDE; <\/p>\n\n\n\n 55271 Say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza Muhakemesi Kanunu’nun 160.\nmaddesinde yer alan \u201cCumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131, ihbar veya ba\u015fka bir suretle bir su\u00e7un\ni\u015flendi\u011fi izlenimini veren bir h\u00e2li \u00f6\u011frenir \u00f6\u011frenmez kamu davas\u0131n\u0131 a\u00e7maya yer\nolup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar vermek \u00fczere hemen i\u015fin ger\u00e7e\u011fini ara\u015ft\u0131rmaya ba\u015flar.\nCumhuriyet savc\u0131s\u0131, madd\u00ee ger\u00e7e\u011fin ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 ve adil bir yarg\u0131laman\u0131n\nyap\u0131labilmesi i\u00e7in, emrindeki adl\u00ee kolluk g\u00f6revlileri marifetiyle, \u015f\u00fcphelinin\nlehine ve aleyhine olan delilleri toplayarak muhafaza alt\u0131na almakla ve \u015f\u00fcphelinin\nhaklar\u0131n\u0131 korumakla y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcd\u00fcr.\u201d \u015feklindeki d\u00fczenleme kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda, Cumhuriyet\nsavc\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n soru\u015fturma yapmak zorunda oldu\u011fu, dosya kapsam\u0131na g\u00f6re su\u00e7a konu\n“nakit teminat\/depozito iadesi” dilek\u00e7esinin ilgili kurumdan\ngetirtilerek \u00fczerinde bulunan imzalar\u0131n \u015f\u00fcpheliler veya m\u00fc\u015ftekiye\/m\u00fc\u015fteriye\naidiyetine dair kriminal raporu al\u0131nmadan, keza \u015f\u00fcpheliler ve tan\u0131klar\ntaraf\u0131ndan ilgili paran\u0131n m\u00fc\u015ftekinin hesab\u0131na aktar\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ifade edilmesine,\nm\u00fc\u015fteki taraf\u0131ndan ise aksinin iddia edilmesine kar\u015f\u0131n bu y\u00f6nde her hangi bir\nara\u015ft\u0131rma yap\u0131lmaks\u0131z\u0131n eksik soru\u015fturmaya dayal\u0131 kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na\ndair karar verildi\u011fi, ortada 5271 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’a uygun bir soru\u015fturman\u0131n\nbulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 bir durumda, an\u0131lan Kanun’un 160<\/a>.\nmaddesi ve di\u011fer maddeleri uyar\u0131nca soru\u015fturma yapmas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flamak maksad\u0131yla\nitiraz\u0131n kabul edilmesi gerekti\u011fi g\u00f6zetilmeden, yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde reddine karar\nverilmesinde isabet g\u00f6r\u00fclmedi\u011finden an\u0131lan karar\u0131n bozulmas\u0131 gerekti\u011finin ihbar\nolundu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. <\/p>\n\n\n\n GERE\u011e\u0130 G\u00d6R\u00dc\u015e\u00dcL\u00dcP D\u00dc\u015e\u00dcN\u00dcLD\u00dc: <\/p>\n\n\n\n KARAR : <\/strong>5271 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 160<\/a>.\nmaddesi uyar\u0131nca, bir su\u00e7un i\u015flendi\u011fi ihbar\u0131n\u0131 alan Cumhuriyet Savc\u0131s\u0131, delil\ntoplay\u0131p maddi ger\u00e7e\u011fi ara\u015ft\u0131rmaya ba\u015flayarak, su\u00e7un i\u015flendi\u011fi hususunda\nyeterli \u015f\u00fcphe bulunmas\u0131 halinde, ayn\u0131 Kanun’un 170\/2. maddesi uyar\u0131nca\niddianame d\u00fczenleyip kamu davas\u0131n\u0131 a\u00e7makla, yeterli \u015f\u00fcphe bulunmamas\u0131 halinde\nise Kanun’un 172. maddesi uyar\u0131nca kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar vermekle\ng\u00f6revli bulunmaktad\u0131r. <\/p>\n\n\n\n SONU\u00c7 : <\/strong>\u0130nceleme konusu dosyada, Cumhuriyet Savc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nca,\n\u015f\u00fcpheliler ve tan\u0131klar\u0131n ifadesinin al\u0131nmas\u0131 d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda soru\u015fturma yap\u0131lmaks\u0131z\u0131n\nve su\u00e7a konu ”nakit teminat\/depozito iadesi” dilek\u00e7esinin ilgili kurumdan\ngetirtilip \u00fczerinde bulunan imzalar\u0131n \u015f\u00fcpheliler veya m\u00fc\u015ftekiye\/m\u00fc\u015fteriye\naidiyetine dair kriminal raporu al\u0131nmadan, m\u00fc\u015fteki vekilinin m\u00fc\u015ftekinin hesab\u0131na\naktar\u0131lan su\u00e7a konu paran\u0131n \u015f\u00fcphelilerce belli aral\u0131klarla m\u00fc\u015ftekiye ait\ninternet bankac\u0131l\u0131k \u015fifrelerini kullanmak suretiyle \u00e7ektiklerini ifade etmesine\nkar\u015f\u0131n \u015f\u00fcphelilerin m\u00fc\u015ftekinin cep telefonuna gelen onay mesajlar\u0131n\u0131\nkendilerine g\u00f6ndermesi \u00fczerine hesab\u0131na girerek g\u00fcmr\u00fck i\u015flemelerini\nyapt\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 ve bu hususa dair m\u00fc\u015ftekinin \u00e7ekmi\u015f oldu\u011fu 750 sayfa \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131n\u0131n\nal\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, gerekirse teslim edebileceklerini belirtmeleri kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda; su\u00e7a\nkonu paran\u0131n havale edildi\u011fi m\u00fc\u015ftekiye ait banka d\u00f6k\u00fcmanlar\u0131 ile m\u00fc\u015ftekinin cep\ntelefonuna ait d\u00f6k\u00fcmanlar getirtilip \u015f\u00fcphelilerin savunmalar\u0131nda bildirdikleri\nm\u00fc\u015ftekinin kendilerine \u00e7ekti\u011fi mesajlar\u0131 i\u00e7erir \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131lar da istenerek\ntaraflar\u0131n beyan ve savunmalar\u0131 do\u011frultusunda inceleme yap\u0131ld\u0131ktan sonra\nsonucuna g\u00f6re \u015f\u00fcphelilerin hukuki durumlar\u0131n\u0131n de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekti\u011fi\ng\u00f6zetilmeden, soyut gerek\u00e7elerle kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar verilmesi\nkar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda, Kanun’un \u00f6ng\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc \u015fekilde soru\u015fturma yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n sa\u011flanmas\u0131 i\u00e7in\nitiraz merciince itiraz\u0131n kabul\u00fcne karar verilmesi gerekirken, reddine karar\nverilmesi sebebiyle kanun yarar\u0131na bozma istemi yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden, … Sulh\nCeza Mahkemesince kesin olarak verilen 02\/05\/2016 g\u00fcn ve 2016\/1493 De\u011fi\u015fik \u0130\u015f\nsay\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n, 5271 Say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza Muhakemesi Kanunu’nun 309<\/a>.\nmaddesinin 3. f\u0131kras\u0131 uyar\u0131nca BOZULMASINA, ayn\u0131 maddenin 4. f\u0131kra (a) bendi\nuyar\u0131nca sonraki i\u015flemlerin itiraz merciince yerine getirilmesine, 30\/03\/2017\ntarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Avukat Dr. \u015eaban Cankat TA\u015eKIN- Bursa Barosu<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Bili\u015fim hukuku ve ceza hukuku alan\u0131nda bir karar\u0131 payla\u015f\u0131yorum Kaynak:\u00a0http:\/\/www.kazanci.com\/kho2\/ibb\/giris.htm YARGITAY 13. CEZA DA\u0130RES\u0130 E. 2017\/2134 K. 2017\/3321 T. 30.3.2017 DAVA : Resmi belgede sahtecilik ve bili\u015fim sistemlerinin kullan\u0131lmas\u0131 suretiyle h\u0131rs\u0131zl\u0131k su\u00e7undan \u015f\u00fcpheliler … … ve … … haklar\u0131nda yap\u0131lan … Okumaya devam et