<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Bili\u015fim hukuku ve ceza hukuku hakk\u0131ndaki \u00f6nemli bir karar\u0131 a\u015fa\u011f\u0131da payla\u015f\u0131yorum.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n Davac\u0131, i\u00e7erik sa\u011flay\u0131c\u0131ya ula\u015f\u0131lamad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan yasa gere\u011fi hizmet sa\u011flay\u0131c\u0131lar\u0131n sorumlu oldu\u011funu iddia ederek her iki daval\u0131ya y\u00f6nelik davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcyle ilgili internet sitesinin eri\u015fiminin engellenmesine, marka hakk\u0131na yap\u0131lan tecav\u00fcz\u00fcn menine, ilgili sitesinin i\u00e7erik sa\u011flay\u0131c\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n tespit edilmesine karar verilmesini istemi\u015ftir. Mahkemece, i\u00e7erik sa\u011flay\u0131c\u0131 asli fail aleyhine uyar\u0131 ya da dava yoluna gidilmeksizin servis sa\u011flay\u0131c\u0131 olan daval\u0131lar aleyhine dava a\u00e7ma ko\u015fulunun ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmedi\u011fi gerek\u00e7esiyle dava reddedilmi\u015ftir. Oysa, mahkemenin de kabul\u00fcnde oldu\u011fu \u00fczere dava d\u0131\u015f\u0131 i\u00e7erik sa\u011flay\u0131c\u0131 asli fail olup, herhangi bir ihtarname g\u00f6nderilmesi, ( uyar\u0131\/kald\u0131r ) zorunlulu\u011fu olmaks\u0131z\u0131n hakk\u0131nda do\u011frudan dava a\u00e7\u0131labilmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr. \u00d6te yandan, m\u00fcteselsil sorumluluk esaslar\u0131na g\u00f6re zarar g\u00f6ren ki\u015fi zarar verenlerin hepsine kar\u015f\u0131 birlikte dava a\u00e7abilece\u011fi gibi, m\u00fcteselsil sorumlulardan sadece bir k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131 dava etmek hususunda se\u00e7imlik hakk\u0131na sahiptir. Bu bak\u0131mdan uygun ko\u015fullar\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesi halinde ( ihtarname tebli\u011fi ) asli faile dava a\u00e7\u0131lmadan daval\u0131lar aleyhine i\u015fbu davan\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr. Davac\u0131 taraf\u00e7a, daval\u0131lara uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k konusu i\u00e7eri\u011fin kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in ihtarname g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi, bu hususta ihtiyati tedbir karar\u0131 verilerek infaz edildi\u011fi, daval\u0131lar\u0131n aleyhlerine a\u00e7\u0131lan i\u015fbu davan\u0131n reddini savunduklar\u0131 da g\u00f6zetilmek suretiyle, dava a\u00e7ma ko\u015fulunun olu\u015ftu\u011fu g\u00f6zetilerek uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n esas\u0131n\u0131n incelenip has\u0131l olacak sonuca g\u00f6re bir karar verilmesi gerekir. <\/p>\n\n\n\n \nKaynak: http:\/\/www.kazanci.com\/kho2\/ibb\/giris.htm<\/p>\n\n\n\n (Tam s\u00fcr\u00fcm i\u00e7in de ayn\u0131 linke\nt\u0131klay\u0131n\u0131z)<\/p>\n\n\n\n Avukat Dr. \u015eaban Cankat TA\u015eKIN-Bursa Barosu <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Bili\u015fim hukuku ve ceza hukuku hakk\u0131ndaki \u00f6nemli bir karar\u0131 a\u015fa\u011f\u0131da payla\u015f\u0131yorum. Davac\u0131, i\u00e7erik sa\u011flay\u0131c\u0131ya ula\u015f\u0131lamad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan yasa gere\u011fi hizmet sa\u011flay\u0131c\u0131lar\u0131n sorumlu oldu\u011funu iddia ederek her iki daval\u0131ya y\u00f6nelik davan\u0131n kabul\u00fcyle ilgili internet sitesinin eri\u015fiminin engellenmesine, marka hakk\u0131na yap\u0131lan tecav\u00fcz\u00fcn menine, ilgili … Okumaya devam et YARGITAY<\/h4>\n\n\n\n
11. HUKUK DA\u0130RES\u0130<\/h4>\n\n\n\n
E. 2016\/1613<\/h4>\n\n\n\n
K. 2017\/6599<\/h4>\n\n\n\n
T. 27.11.2017<\/h4>\n\n\n\n