Bili\u015fim su\u00e7lar\u0131 (m\u00fcstehcenlik su\u00e7u: TCK 226) ve ceza hukuku hakk\u0131nda avukatlar\u0131n da i\u015fine yarayabilecek bir karar\u0131 payla\u015f\u0131yorum.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
T.C.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n YARGITAY<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n 4. CEZA DA\u0130RES\u0130<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n E. 2020\/6371<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n K. 2021\/868<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n T. 14.1.2021<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n \u2022 M\u00dcSTEHCENL\u0130K SU\u00c7U (\u00dcretim Eyleminin Olayda Ger\u00e7ekle\u015fip Ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmedi\u011finin Yarg\u0131tay Denetimine \u0130mkan Verecek \u015eekilde \u0130ncelenerek Sonucuna G\u00f6re San\u0131\u011f\u0131n Hukuki Durumunun Belirlenmesi Gerekti\u011finin G\u00f6zetilmeyerek Eksik Ara\u015ft\u0131rmayla San\u0131\u011f\u0131n Mahkumiyetine Karar Verilmesinin Hatal\u0131 Oldu\u011fu )<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n \u2022 UZLA\u015eTIRMA (Birlikte \u0130\u015flenen \u015eantaj ve M\u00fcstehcenlik Su\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n Ma\u011fduru \u0130le Hakaret Su\u00e7unun Ma\u011fdurunun Farkl\u0131 Olmas\u0131 Kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda San\u0131\u011f\u0131n Kat\u0131lana Kar\u015f\u0131 \u0130\u015fledi\u011fi Hakaret Su\u00e7u Y\u00f6n\u00fcnden Y\u00f6ntemine Uygun Olarak Uzla\u015ft\u0131rma \u00d6nerisinde Bulunulmas\u0131 ve Sonucuna G\u00f6re San\u0131\u011f\u0131n Hukuki Durumunun Yeniden De\u011ferlendirilmesi Gerekti\u011fi )<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n \u2022 B\u0130L\u0130RK\u0130\u015e\u0130 \u0130NCELEMES\u0130 (San\u0131ktan Ele Ge\u00e7irilen Harddisk \u00dczerinde \u0130nceleme Yap\u0131lmas\u0131 Sa\u011flanarak Profil Hesab\u0131na San\u0131\u011f\u0131n Bilgisayar\u0131ndan Giri\u015f Yap\u0131l\u0131p Yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 Bu Kullan\u0131c\u0131 Ad\u0131yla San\u0131k Taraf\u0131ndan Bir \u0130\u015flem Yap\u0131l\u0131p Yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n Tespiti ve Soru\u015fturma Dosyas\u0131n\u0131n Ak\u0131beti Ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131l\u0131p M\u00fcmk\u00fcnse Getirtilerek Usul\u00fcnce \u0130ncelenmesi Gerekti\u011fi )<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n 5237\/m.<\/strong>226<\/strong><\/a>\/3<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n 5271\/m.<\/strong>253<\/strong><\/a>,<\/strong>254<\/strong><\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n \u00d6ZET : <\/strong>H\u00fck\u00fcmden sonra y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren, 7188 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 26<\/a>. maddesiyle de\u011fi\u015fik CMK’n\u0131n 253<\/a>. maddesi uyar\u0131nca uzla\u015ft\u0131rma kapsam\u0131na giren bir su\u00e7un, bu kapsama girmeyen bir ba\u015fka su\u00e7la birlikte ayn\u0131 ma\u011fdura kar\u015f\u0131 i\u015flenmi\u015f olmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde uzla\u015ft\u0131rma h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin uygulanamayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n h\u00fck\u00fcm alt\u0131na al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131, somut olayda birlikte i\u015flenen \u015fantaj ve m\u00fcstehcenlik su\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ma\u011fduru ile hakaret su\u00e7unun ma\u011fdurunun farkl\u0131 olmas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n, kat\u0131lana kar\u015f\u0131 i\u015fledi\u011fi hakaret su\u00e7u y\u00f6n\u00fcnden, CMK’n\u0131n 253<\/a>. ve devam\u0131 maddeleri uyar\u0131nca y\u00f6ntemine uygun olarak uzla\u015ft\u0131rma \u00f6nerisinde bulunulmas\u0131 ve sonucuna g\u00f6re san\u0131\u011f\u0131n hukuki durumunun yeniden de\u011ferlendirilmesinde zorunluluk bulunmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Konusunda uzman bilirki\u015filerce san\u0131ktan ele ge\u00e7irilen harddisk \u00fczerinde inceleme yap\u0131lmas\u0131 sa\u011flanarak, profil hesab\u0131na san\u0131\u011f\u0131n bilgisayar\u0131ndan giri\u015f yap\u0131l\u0131p yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu kullan\u0131c\u0131 ad\u0131yla san\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan bir i\u015flem yap\u0131l\u0131p yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tespiti ve soru\u015fturma dosyas\u0131n\u0131n ak\u0131beti ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131l\u0131p, m\u00fcmk\u00fcnse getirtilerek usul\u00fcnce incelenmesi ve sonucuna g\u00f6re TCK’n\u0131n 226<\/a>\/3. maddesinin ilk c\u00fcmlesinde tan\u0131mlanan \u201c\u00fcretim\u201d eyleminin olayda ger\u00e7ekle\u015fip ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmedi\u011finin Yarg\u0131tay denetimine imkan verecek \u015fekilde incelenerek sonucuna g\u00f6re san\u0131\u011f\u0131n hukuki durumunun belirlenmesi gerekti\u011finin g\u00f6zetilmeyerek, eksik ara\u015ft\u0131rmayla yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde an\u0131lan Kanun maddesi uyar\u0131nca san\u0131\u011f\u0131n mahkumiyetine karar verilmesi, hatal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n DAVA : <\/strong>Yerel Mahkemece verilen h\u00fck\u00fcmler temyiz edilmekle, ba\u015fvurunun s\u00fcresi ve karar\u0131n niteli\u011fi ile su\u00e7 tarihine g\u00f6re dosya g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n\n\n\n KARAR : <\/strong>Temyiz iste\u011finin reddi nedenleri bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan i\u015fin esas\u0131na ge\u00e7ildi.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Vicdani kan\u0131n\u0131n olu\u015ftu\u011fu duru\u015fma s\u00fcrecini yans\u0131tan tutanaklar, belgeler ve gerek\u00e7e i\u00e7eri\u011fine g\u00f6re yap\u0131lan incelemede,<\/p>\n\n\n\n A- ) San\u0131\u011fa y\u00fckletilen \u015fantaj eylemiyle ula\u015f\u0131lan \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcm\u00fc hakl\u0131 k\u0131l\u0131c\u0131 zorunlu \u00f6\u011felerinin ve bu eylemin san\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan i\u015flendi\u011finin Kanuna uygun olarak y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen duru\u015fma sonucu saptand\u0131\u011f\u0131, b\u00fct\u00fcn kan\u0131tlarla a\u015famalarda ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen iddia ve savunmalar\u0131n temyiz denetimini sa\u011flayacak bi\u00e7imde ve eksiksiz sergilendi\u011fi, \u00f6zleri de\u011fi\u015ftirilmeksizin tart\u0131\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, vicdani kan\u0131n\u0131n kesin, tutarl\u0131 ve \u00e7eli\u015fmeyen verilere dayand\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131,<\/p>\n\n\n\n Eylemin do\u011fru olarak nitelendirildi\u011fi ve Kanunda \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen su\u00e7 tipine uydu\u011fu,<\/p>\n\n\n\n Cezan\u0131n kanuni ba\u011flamda uyguland\u0131\u011f\u0131,<\/p>\n\n\n\n Anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, san\u0131k … ve m\u00fcdafisinin ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc nedenler yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015f olmakla, tebli\u011fnameye uygun olarak, TEMY\u0130Z DAVASININ ESASTAN REDD\u0130YLE H\u00dcKM\u00dcN ONANMASINA,<\/p>\n\n\n\n B- ) San\u0131k hakk\u0131nda kat\u0131lan …’a kar\u015f\u0131 hakaret su\u00e7undan kurulan h\u00fckm\u00fcn temyizinde ise, ba\u015fkaca nedenler yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Ancak<\/p>\n\n\n\n 1- ) H\u00fck\u00fcmden sonra 24\/10\/2019 tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren, 7188 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 26<\/a>. maddesiyle de\u011fi\u015fik CMK’n\u0131n 253<\/a>. maddesi uyar\u0131nca uzla\u015ft\u0131rma kapsam\u0131na giren bir su\u00e7un, bu kapsama girmeyen bir ba\u015fka su\u00e7la birlikte ayn\u0131 ma\u011fdura kar\u015f\u0131 i\u015flenmi\u015f olmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde uzla\u015ft\u0131rma h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin uygulanamayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n h\u00fck\u00fcm alt\u0131na al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131, somut olayda birlikte i\u015flenen \u015fantaj ve m\u00fcstehcenlik su\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131n ma\u011fduru ile hakaret su\u00e7unun ma\u011fdurunun farkl\u0131 olmas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n, kat\u0131lan …’a kar\u015f\u0131 i\u015fledi\u011fi hakaret su\u00e7u y\u00f6n\u00fcnden, CMK’n\u0131n 253<\/a>. ve devam\u0131 maddeleri uyar\u0131nca y\u00f6ntemine uygun olarak uzla\u015ft\u0131rma \u00f6nerisinde bulunulmas\u0131 ve sonucuna g\u00f6re san\u0131\u011f\u0131n hukuki durumunun yeniden de\u011ferlendirilmesinde zorunluluk bulunmas\u0131,<\/p>\n\n\n\n 2- ) 17\/10\/2019 g\u00fcn ve 7188 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 24<\/a>. maddesiyle 5271 Say\u0131l\u0131 CMK’n\u0131n 251<\/a>. maddesinde Basit Yarg\u0131lama Usul\u00fc d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Ancak bu d\u00fczenlemenin uygulanmas\u0131yla ilgili olarak, 7188 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 31<\/a>. maddesiyle, 5271 Say\u0131l\u0131 CMK’ya eklenen ge\u00e7ici 5. maddenin (d ) bendi ile; “01\/01\/2020 tarihi itibariyle kovu\u015fturma evresine ge\u00e7ilmi\u015f, h\u00fckme ba\u011flanm\u0131\u015f veya kesinle\u015fmi\u015f dosyalarda seri muhakeme usul\u00fc ile basit yarg\u0131lama usul\u00fc uygulanmaz” h\u00fckm\u00fc getirilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Konuyu somut norm denetimi yoluyla inceleyen Anayasa Mahkemesi (25\/06\/2020, 2020\/16, 2020\/33; R.G. 19\/08\/2020, Say\u0131: 31218 ), s\u00f6z\u00fc ge\u00e7en ge\u00e7ici 5\/d maddesindeki h\u00fckm\u00fcn, “kovu\u015fturma evresine ge\u00e7ilmi\u015f” ibaresinin ayn\u0131 bentte yer alan, “basit yarg\u0131lama usul\u00fc” y\u00f6n\u00fcnden Anayasa’n\u0131n 38. maddesine ayk\u0131r\u0131 g\u00f6rerek iptaline karar vermi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Anayasa Mahkemesi karar\u0131nda, h\u00fckme ba\u011flanm\u0131\u015f dosyalarla ilgili iptale karar verilmemi\u015f ise de, 5271 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 2<\/a>\/1-(f ) maddesince h\u00fckme ba\u011flanm\u0131\u015f dosyalarla ilgili olarak kovu\u015fturma evresinin kesinle\u015fmeye kadar devam etmesi ve ayn\u0131 Yasan\u0131n 251\/3. maddesi gere\u011fi mahk\u00fbmiyet h\u00fckm\u00fc verildi\u011fi takdirde sonu\u00e7 cezadan d\u00f6rtte bir indirim \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclmesi, bu durumunda temyiz incelemesi devam eden dosyalar bak\u0131m\u0131ndan lehe d\u00fczenleme getirmesi kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda,<\/p>\n\n\n\n Anayasa Mahkemesi’nin iptal karar\u0131nda; san\u0131k lehine getirilen yeni d\u00fczenlemenin, 7188 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 31<\/a>. maddesi gere\u011fince 5271 Say\u0131l\u0131 CMK’ya eklenen ge\u00e7ici 5. maddesiyle “kovu\u015fturma evresine ge\u00e7ilmi\u015f” dosyalar bak\u0131m\u0131ndan uygulanmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fine i\u015faret edildi\u011finden, temyiz incelemesi yap\u0131lan ve 5271 Say\u0131l\u0131 CMK’n\u0131n 251<\/a>\/1. maddesi kapsam\u0131na giren su\u00e7lar y\u00f6n\u00fcnden; Anayasa’n\u0131n 38. maddesiyle 5237 Say\u0131l\u0131 TCK’n\u0131n 7<\/a> ve 5271 Say\u0131l\u0131 CMK’n\u0131n 251<\/a> vd. maddeleri gere\u011fince yeniden de\u011ferlendirme yap\u0131lmas\u0131 zorunlulu\u011fu,<\/p>\n\n\n\n C- ) M\u00fcstehcenlik su\u00e7undan kurulan h\u00fckm\u00fcn temyizinde ise; ba\u015fkaca nedenler yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Ancak;<\/p>\n\n\n\n 1- ) San\u0131\u011f\u0131n ya\u015f\u0131 k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck kat\u0131lan …’\u0131n \u00e7\u0131plak foto\u011fraflar\u0131n\u0131 temin etti\u011fi kabul olunarak san\u0131\u011f\u0131n TCK’n\u0131n 226<\/a>\/3. maddesinin ilk c\u00fcmlesi uyar\u0131nca mahk\u00fbmiyetine karar verilmi\u015f ise de, ya\u015f\u0131 k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck kat\u0131lan …’\u0131n a\u015famalardaki anlat\u0131mlar\u0131nda kendisine ait foto\u011fraflar\u0131 san\u0131\u011fa g\u00f6ndermedi\u011fini, foto\u011fraflar\u0131 internet \u00fczerinden \u201cS. S.\u201d kullan\u0131c\u0131 ad\u0131yla bildi\u011fi ki\u015fiye g\u00f6nderdi\u011fini, bu ki\u015fiyi tan\u0131mad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, hi\u00e7 g\u00f6rmedi\u011fini, ele ge\u00e7en foto\u011fraflar\u0131 \u201cM. A.\u201d isimli profili kullanan san\u0131\u011fa \u201cS. S.\u201d isimli kullan\u0131c\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6ndermi\u015f oldu\u011funu, \u201cS. S.\u201d isimli profilin san\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan kullan\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan \u015f\u00fcphelendi\u011fini s\u00f6ylemesi, soru\u015fturma dosyas\u0131nda yap\u0131lan incelemede ise \u015f\u00fcpheli S. S. hakk\u0131nda ay\u0131rma karar\u0131 verilerek Adana Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n 2014\/80624 numaral\u0131 soru\u015fturma kayd\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011funun g\u00f6r\u00fclmesi kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda,<\/p>\n\n\n\n Konusunda uzman bilirki\u015filerce san\u0131ktan ele ge\u00e7irilen harddisk \u00fczerinde inceleme yap\u0131lmas\u0131 sa\u011flanarak, \u201cS. S.\u201d isimli profil hesab\u0131na san\u0131\u011f\u0131n bilgisayar\u0131ndan giri\u015f yap\u0131l\u0131p yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, bu kullan\u0131c\u0131 ad\u0131yla san\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan bir i\u015flem yap\u0131l\u0131p yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tespiti ve Adana Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n 2014\/80624 numaral\u0131 soru\u015fturma dosyas\u0131n\u0131n ak\u0131beti ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131l\u0131p, m\u00fcmk\u00fcnse getirtilerek usul\u00fcnce incelenmesi ve sonucuna g\u00f6re TCK’n\u0131n 226<\/a>\/3. maddesinin ilk c\u00fcmlesinde tan\u0131mlanan \u201c\u00fcretim\u201d eyleminin olayda ger\u00e7ekle\u015fip ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmedi\u011finin Yarg\u0131tay denetimine imkan verecek \u015fekilde incelenerek sonucuna g\u00f6re san\u0131\u011f\u0131n hukuki durumunun belirlenmesi gerekti\u011finin g\u00f6zetilmeyerek, eksik ara\u015ft\u0131rmayla yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde an\u0131lan Kanun maddesi uyar\u0131nca san\u0131\u011f\u0131n mahkumiyetine karar verilmesi,<\/p>\n\n\n\n 2- ) Kabule g\u00f6re de;<\/p>\n\n\n\n a- ) El konulan materyallerde hem \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n kullan\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 cinsel i\u00e7erikli g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fcleri bulundurdu\u011funun tespiti, hem de bu g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fclerin internet ortam\u0131nda yay\u0131nlad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tespiti halinde, her ne kadar san\u0131\u011f\u0131n eylemleri TCK’n\u0131n 226<\/a>\/3. maddesinin son c\u00fcmlesi ve 226\/5. maddesindeki iki ayr\u0131 su\u00e7u olu\u015ftursa da, TCK’n\u0131n 44<\/a>. maddesinde tan\u0131mlanan fikri i\u00e7tima kural\u0131 gere\u011fince en a\u011f\u0131r cezay\u0131 \u00f6ng\u00f6ren TCK’n\u0131n 226<\/a>\/5. maddesinin uygulanmas\u0131 ve ma\u011fdur say\u0131s\u0131nca h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi g\u00f6zetilmelidir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u0130ncelemeye konu olayda; ya\u015f\u0131 k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck kat\u0131lan …’\u0131n a\u015famalardaki anlat\u0131mlar\u0131nda kendisine ait m\u00fcstehcen nitelikteki foto\u011fraflar\u0131n san\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan internet ortam\u0131nda yay\u0131nland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6ylemesi kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda, san\u0131ktan ele ge\u00e7irilen harddisk \u00fczerinde konusunda uzman bilirki\u015filerce inceleme yap\u0131lmas\u0131 sa\u011flanarak ele ge\u00e7en g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fclerin san\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan payla\u015f\u0131l\u0131p payla\u015f\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tespit edilmesi, sonucuna g\u00f6re TCK’n\u0131n 226<\/a>\/5. maddesinin be\u015finci f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n uygulanma ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n olu\u015fup olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n Yarg\u0131tay denetimine imkan verecek \u015fekilde belirlenmesi gerekti\u011finin g\u00f6zetilmemesi,<\/p>\n\n\n\n b- ) TCK’n\u0131n 226<\/a>\/4 ve 226<\/a>\/3. maddesinin 2. c\u00fcmlesindeki su\u00e7lar\u0131n olu\u015fabilmesi i\u00e7in, \u015fiddet kullan\u0131larak, hayvanlarla, \u00f6lm\u00fc\u015f insan bedeni \u00fczerinde veya do\u011fal olmayan yoldan yap\u0131lan cinsel davran\u0131\u015flara ili\u015fkin ya da i\u00e7erisinde \u00e7ocuklar\u0131n, temsili \u00e7ocuk g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fclerinin veya \u00e7ocuk gibi g\u00f6r\u00fcnen ki\u015filerin bulundu\u011fu m\u00fcstehcen g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fc, yaz\u0131 veya s\u00f6zleri i\u00e7eren \u00fcr\u00fcnlerin, \u00fclkeye sokulmas\u0131, \u00e7o\u011falt\u0131lmas\u0131, sat\u0131\u015fa arz edilmesi, sat\u0131lmas\u0131, nakledilmesi, depolanmas\u0131, ihra\u00e7 edilmesi, bulundurulmas\u0131 ya da ba\u015fkalar\u0131n\u0131n kullan\u0131m\u0131na sunulmas\u0131 gerekmektedir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Ma\u011fdurun kim oldu\u011funun tespit edilemedi\u011fi durumlarda m\u00fcstehcen g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fc say\u0131s\u0131 birden fazla olsa bile tek eylem kabul edilmelidir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Dosyaya Adli Bili\u015fim B\u00fcro Amirli\u011fi taraf\u0131ndan d\u00fczenlenen 28\/11\/2014 tarihli inceleme raporunda, ya\u015f\u0131 k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck kat\u0131lan … d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kimlikleri tespit edilemeyen k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck k\u0131z \u00e7ocuklar\u0131na ait olabilece\u011fi de\u011ferlendirilen 16 adet resim dosyas\u0131n\u0131n tespit edildi\u011finin belirtilmesi, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n savunmas\u0131nda bu g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fcleri kendisinin y\u00fcklemedi\u011fini, bilgisayar\u0131na kendili\u011finden y\u00fcklenmi\u015f olabilece\u011fini s\u00f6ylemesi kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda, su\u00e7a konu bilgisayar\u0131n sabit diskinde tespit edilen m\u00fcstehcen g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fclerin ge\u00e7ici internet dosyalar\u0131 aras\u0131nda olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 hususunda ve bu g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fclerin i\u015fletim sistemi taraf\u0131ndan bir internet sitesinin ziyaret edilmesi s\u0131ras\u0131nda otomatik olarak m\u0131 veya kullan\u0131c\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan iradi olarak m\u0131 indirildi\u011fi ya da ba\u015fka bir ortamdan kopyalanmak suretiyle mi belirtilen dosyalar i\u00e7erisine kaydedildi\u011finin belirlenmesine y\u00f6nelik olarak, orijinal sabit diskten al\u0131nan imaj \u00fczerinden, ku\u015fkuya yer b\u0131rakmayacak nitelikte, detayl\u0131 ve denetime a\u00e7\u0131k uzman bilirki\u015fiden al\u0131nacak rapor do\u011frultusunda ya\u015f\u0131 k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck kat\u0131lan … d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kimlikleri tespit edilemeyen k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck k\u0131z \u00e7ocuklar\u0131na ait olabilece\u011fi de\u011ferlendirilen 16 adet resim dosyas\u0131yla ilgili olarak, san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda ya\u015f\u0131 k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck kat\u0131lan …’a kar\u015f\u0131 eylemleri d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda ayr\u0131ca TCK’n\u0131n 226<\/a>\/3. maddesinin 2. c\u00fcmlesinin uygulanma ko\u015fullar\u0131 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden san\u0131\u011f\u0131n hukuki durumunun de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekti\u011finin g\u00f6zetilmemesi,<\/p>\n\n\n\n SONU\u00c7 : <\/strong>Kanuna ayk\u0131r\u0131 ve san\u0131k … ve m\u00fcdafisinin temyiz nedenleri yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden tebli\u011fnameye ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak, H\u00dcKM\u00dcN BOZULMASINA, yeniden h\u00fck\u00fcm kurulurken 5320 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 8<\/a>. maddesi gere\u011fince y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte olan 1412 Say\u0131l\u0131 CMUK’n\u0131n 326<\/a>\/ son maddesinin g\u00f6zetilmesine, yarg\u0131laman\u0131n bozma \u00f6ncesi a\u015famadan ba\u015flayarak s\u00fcrd\u00fcr\u00fcl\u00fcp sonu\u00e7land\u0131r\u0131lmak \u00fczere dosyan\u0131n esas\/h\u00fck\u00fcm mahkemesine g\u00f6nderilmesine, 14.01.2021 tarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Kaynak: Kazanc\u0131 \u0130\u00e7tihat program\u0131 <\/p>\n\n\n\n Avukat Do\u00e7. Dr. \u015eaban Cankat TA\u015eKIN, Bursa Barosu<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Bili\u015fim su\u00e7lar\u0131 (m\u00fcstehcenlik su\u00e7u: TCK 226) ve ceza hukuku hakk\u0131nda avukatlar\u0131n da i\u015fine yarayabilecek bir karar\u0131 payla\u015f\u0131yorum. T.C. YARGITAY 4. CEZA DA\u0130RES\u0130 E. 2020\/6371 K. 2021\/868 T. 14.1.2021 \u2022 M\u00dcSTEHCENL\u0130K SU\u00c7U (\u00dcretim Eyleminin Olayda Ger\u00e7ekle\u015fip Ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmedi\u011finin Yarg\u0131tay Denetimine \u0130mkan Verecek … Okumaya devam et