Bili\u015fim su\u00e7lar\u0131 ve ceza hukuku alan\u0131nda (haberle\u015fmenin gizlili\u011fini ihlal su\u00e7u: TCK 132) avukatlar\u0131n da i\u015fine yarayabilecek bir karar\u0131 payla\u015f\u0131yorum.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
T.C.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n YARGITAY<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n 12. CEZA DA\u0130RES\u0130<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n E. 2012\/13228<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n K. 2012\/14787<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n T. 12.6.2012<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n \u2022 HABERLE\u015eMEN\u0130N G\u0130ZL\u0130L\u0130\u011e\u0130N\u0130 \u0130HLAL (Haberle\u015fme \u0130\u00e7eri\u011fi Bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131\/Su\u00e7un Yasal Unsurlar\u0131n\u0131n Olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n G\u00f6zetilece\u011fi – Gizlili\u011fi Sa\u011flamak Bak\u0131m\u0131ndan Yap\u0131lan Eylemlerinin Tam Olarak Tespit Edilmedi\u011fi\/Frekansa \u015eifresiz Giri\u015f \u0130mkan\u0131n\u0131n Tespiti)<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n \u2022 SU\u00c7UN UNSURLARINDA HATA YAPILDI\u011eI (Tespiti Yap\u0131lan \u0130hlale Konu Bir Haberle\u015fme \u0130\u00e7eri\u011fi Bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n G\u00f6zetilmesi Gere\u011fi)<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n \u2022 HABERLE\u015eMEN\u0130N \u0130\u00c7ER\u0130\u011e\u0130 (Frekansa \u015eifresiz ve Zahmetsizce Giri\u015f \u0130mkan\u0131 Olup Olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n Belirlenmesi Gere\u011fi – Gizlili\u011fi Sa\u011flamak Bak\u0131m\u0131ndan Yap\u0131lan Eylemlerinin Tam Olarak Tespit Edilmedi\u011fi\/Haberle\u015fmenin Gizlili\u011fini \u0130hlal Su\u00e7unun Unsurlar\u0131)<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n \u2022 \u0130Z\u0130NS\u0130Z TELS\u0130Z KULLANIMI (Eldeki Davada 5809 S.K. 63\/4 M. Kapsam\u0131n\u0131n De\u011ferlendirilmesi Gere\u011fi – Su\u00e7un Unsurlar\u0131)<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n \u2022 H\u00dcKM\u00dcN A\u00c7IKLANMASININ GER\u0130 BIRAKILMASI KARARI (Soyut Gerek\u00e7elere Dayal\u0131 Olarak San\u0131\u011f\u0131n Bir Daha Su\u00e7 \u0130\u015flemeyece\u011fi Y\u00f6n\u00fcnde Mahkememizde Olumlu Kanaat Olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u015eeklindeki Gerek\u00e7enin Hatal\u0131 Oldu\u011funun Kabul\u00fc – Haberle\u015fmenin Gizlili\u011fini \u0130hlal)<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n 5809\/m. <\/strong>63<\/strong><\/a>\/4<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n 5237\/m. <\/strong>132<\/strong><\/a>\/1-1,<\/strong>139<\/strong><\/a>\/1<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n \u00d6ZET : <\/strong>Haberle\u015fmenin gizlili\u011fin ihlal su\u00e7undan dolay\u0131 san\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan dinleme sonucu ma\u011fdur olduklar\u0131ndan bahisle \u015fikayet\u00e7i olan ki\u015fi ya da ki\u015filer ve tespiti yap\u0131lan ihlale konu bir haberle\u015fme i\u00e7eri\u011fi bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi, gizlili\u011fi sa\u011flamaya \u00f6zen g\u00f6sterilip g\u00f6sterilmedi\u011fini belirlemek bak\u0131m\u0131ndan, s\u00f6z konusu frekansa, \u015fifresiz ve zahmetsizce giri\u015f imkan\u0131 olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair bir belirleme de yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmakla, an\u0131lan su\u00e7un yasal unsurunun somut olayda ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmedi\u011fi, eylemin 5809 say\u0131l\u0131 Elektronik Haberle\u015fme Kanununun 63<\/a>\/4. maddesi kapsam\u0131nda de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekti\u011fi g\u00f6zetilmeden, su\u00e7 vasf\u0131nda yan\u0131lg\u0131ya d\u00fc\u015f\u00fclerek, san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde haberle\u015fmenin gizlili\u011fini ihlal su\u00e7undan mahkumiyet karar\u0131 verilmesi hatal\u0131d\u0131r.Kabule g\u00f6re ise san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda h\u00fckm\u00fcn a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131n\u0131n geri b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131na yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 karar\u0131 soyut gerek\u00e7elere dayanmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n DAVA : <\/strong>Haberle\u015fmenin gizlili\u011fini ihlal su\u00e7undan, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n mahkumiyetine ili\u015fkin h\u00fck\u00fcm, san\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmekle, dosya incelenerek gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n\n\n\n KARAR : <\/strong>5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK’n\u0131n 132<\/a>\/1-1. c\u00fcmlesinde tan\u0131mlanan haberle\u015fmenin gizlili\u011fini ihlal su\u00e7unun olu\u015fabilmesi i\u00e7in, belirli veya belirlenebilir iki veya daha fazla ki\u015finin, ba\u015fkalar\u0131n\u0131n bilmemeleri gerekti\u011fi y\u00f6n\u00fcnde hakl\u0131 bir inan\u00e7 ve iradeyle hareket ederek, gizlili\u011fi sa\u011flamaya \u00f6zen g\u00f6sterip, elveri\u015fli ara\u00e7lar (internet, telefon, telsiz, faks, mektup, telgraf, ka\u011f\u0131t vb.) ve ortak semboller (s\u00f6z, yaz\u0131, i\u015faret vb.) arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla payla\u015ft\u0131klar\u0131 bilgi, d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnce, duygu ve tutumlar\u0131n\u0131n; \u00f6zel hayata ili\u015fkin olsun ya da olmas\u0131n, ba\u015fka ki\u015fi veya ki\u015filer taraf\u0131ndan, \u00f6zel bir \u00e7aba g\u00f6sterilerek, do\u011frudan veya dolayl\u0131 \u015fekilde (zarf\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lmadan \u0131\u015f\u0131\u011fa tutulan mektupta oldu\u011fu gibi), okunmak veya dinlenmek suretiyle \u00f6\u011frenilmesi gerekti\u011fi, dosya i\u00e7eri\u011fine g\u00f6re; 07.06.2004 tarihinde amat\u00f6r telsizcilik belgesi al\u0131p, s\u00fcresi i\u00e7erisinde telsiz kullan\u0131m ruhsat\u0131n\u0131 yeniletmeyen san\u0131\u011f\u0131n, olay g\u00fcn\u00fc alkol ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u0131rada, durumundan \u015f\u00fcphelenen polisler taraf\u0131ndan, belinde tak\u0131l\u0131 vaziyette ele ge\u00e7irilen telsizinin frekans\u0131n\u0131n, emniyet taraf\u0131ndan asayi\u015f i\u00e7in kullan\u0131lan frekansa ayarland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tespit edilmesi \u015feklinde geli\u015fen eyleminde, 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK’n\u0131n 139<\/a>\/1. maddesi uyar\u0131nca, soru\u015fturulmas\u0131 ve kovu\u015fturulmas\u0131 \u015fikayete ba\u011fl\u0131 olan su\u00e7ta, san\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan dinleme sonucu ma\u011fdur olduklar\u0131ndan bahisle \u015fikayet\u00e7i olan ki\u015fi ya da ki\u015filer ve tespiti yap\u0131lan ihlale konu bir haberle\u015fme i\u00e7eri\u011fi bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi, gizlili\u011fi sa\u011flamaya \u00f6zen g\u00f6sterilip g\u00f6sterilmedi\u011fini belirlemek bak\u0131m\u0131ndan, s\u00f6z konusu frekansa, \u015fifresiz ve zahmetsizce giri\u015f imkan\u0131 olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair bir belirleme de yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lmakla, an\u0131lan su\u00e7un yasal unsurunun somut olayda ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmedi\u011fi, eylemin 5809 say\u0131l\u0131 Elektronik Haberle\u015fme Kanununun 63<\/a>\/4. maddesi kapsam\u0131nda de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekti\u011fi g\u00f6zetilmeden, su\u00e7 vasf\u0131nda yan\u0131lg\u0131ya d\u00fc\u015f\u00fclerek, san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde haberle\u015fmenin gizlili\u011fini ihlal su\u00e7undan mahkumiyet karar\u0131 verilmesi,<\/p>\n\n\n\n Kabul ve uygulamaya g\u00f6re:<\/p>\n\n\n\n Dosya i\u00e7eri\u011findeki delillere g\u00f6re olumsuz bir ki\u015fili\u011fi belirlenemeyen san\u0131\u011f\u0131n, h\u00fckmolunan cezas\u0131nda takdiri indirim yap\u0131l\u0131rken g\u00f6sterilen \u201cge\u00e7mi\u015fi, sosyal ili\u015fkileri, fiilden sonraki ve yarg\u0131lama s\u00fcrecindeki davran\u0131\u015flar\u0131, cezan\u0131n san\u0131\u011f\u0131n gelece\u011fi \u00fczerindeki olas\u0131 etkisi ve su\u00e7unu samimi ikrar\u0131 ile pi\u015fmanl\u0131\u011f\u0131\u201d ifadesiyle \u00e7eli\u015fki olu\u015fturaca\u011f\u0131 nazara al\u0131nmadan, \u201csu\u00e7un i\u015fleni\u015f \u015fekli ve san\u0131\u011f\u0131n ki\u015filik \u00f6zellikleri ile duru\u015fmadaki tutum ve davran\u0131\u015flar\u0131 g\u00f6z\u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131narak san\u0131\u011fa verilen h\u00fckm\u00fcn a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131n\u0131n geri b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131na karar verilmesi halinde bir daha su\u00e7 i\u015flemeyece\u011fi y\u00f6n\u00fcnde mahkememizde olumlu kanaat olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan\u201d \u015feklindeki soyut gerek\u00e7elerle, san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda verilen h\u00fckm\u00fcn a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131n\u0131n geri b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131na yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar verilmesi,<\/p>\n\n\n\n SONU\u00c7 : <\/strong>Bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015f, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n temyiz itirazlar\u0131 bu itibarla yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f olup, h\u00fckm\u00fcn bu sebelerden dolay\u0131 5320 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun 8<\/a>. maddesi uyar\u0131nca halen uygulanmakta olan 1412 say\u0131l\u0131 CMUK’un 321<\/a>. maddesi gere\u011fince isteme ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak BOZULMASINA, 12.06.2012 tarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Kaynak: Kazanc\u0131 \u0130\u00e7tihat Program\u0131<\/p>\n\n\n\n Avukat Do\u00e7. Dr. \u015eaban Cankat TA\u015eKIN, Bursa Barosu<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Bili\u015fim su\u00e7lar\u0131 ve ceza hukuku alan\u0131nda (haberle\u015fmenin gizlili\u011fini ihlal su\u00e7u: TCK 132) avukatlar\u0131n da i\u015fine yarayabilecek bir karar\u0131 payla\u015f\u0131yorum. T.C. YARGITAY 12. CEZA DA\u0130RES\u0130 E. 2012\/13228 K. 2012\/14787 T. 12.6.2012 \u2022 HABERLE\u015eMEN\u0130N G\u0130ZL\u0130L\u0130\u011e\u0130N\u0130 \u0130HLAL (Haberle\u015fme \u0130\u00e7eri\u011fi Bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131\/Su\u00e7un Yasal Unsurlar\u0131n\u0131n Olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n … Okumaya devam et