Bili\u015fim su\u00e7lar\u0131 ve ceza hukuku alan\u0131nda (haberle\u015fmenin gizlili\u011fini ihlal su\u00e7u: TCK 132) avukatlar\u0131n da i\u015fine yarayabilecek bir karar\u0131 payla\u015f\u0131yorum.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Avukat Do\u00e7. Dr. \u015eaban Cankat TA\u015eKIN, Bursa Barosu<\/p>\n\n\n\n
T.C.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n YARGITAY<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n 12. CEZA DA\u0130RES\u0130<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n E. 2018\/8586<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n K. 2019\/9340<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n T. 25.9.2019<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n \u2022 B\u0130L\u0130\u015e\u0130M S\u0130STEM\u0130NE G\u0130RME VE HABERLE\u015eMEN\u0130N G\u0130ZL\u0130L\u0130\u011e\u0130N\u0130 \u0130HLAL ( San\u0131\u011fa Y\u00fcklenen Su\u00e7lar\u0131n San\u0131k Taraf\u0131ndan \u0130\u015flendi\u011finin Sabit Olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 Gerek\u00e7esiyle Beraat Karar\u0131 Verilirken CMK’n\u0131n 223\/2-E Md. F\u0131kra ve Bendinin Yan\u0131nda Ayn\u0131 Kanunun 223\/2-C Md. F\u0131kra ve Bendinin de Uygulama Maddesi Olarak Yaz\u0131lmas\u0131 Suretiyle CMK’n\u0131n 232\/6. Md. ve F\u0131kras\u0131na Uyulmamas\u0131n\u0131n Bozma Nedeni Oldu\u011fu )<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n \u2022 H\u00dcK\u00dcM FIKRASININ \u0130\u00c7ERECE\u011e\u0130 HUSUSLAR ( Bili\u015fim Sistemine Girme ve Haberle\u015fmenin Gizlili\u011fini \u0130hlal – Su\u00e7lar\u0131n San\u0131k Taraf\u0131ndan \u0130\u015flendi\u011finin Sabit Olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 Gerek\u00e7esiyle Beraat Karar\u0131 Verilirken CMK’n\u0131n 223\/2-E Md. F\u0131kra ve Bendinin Yan\u0131nda Ayn\u0131 Kanunun 223\/2-C Md. F\u0131kra ve Bendinin de Uygulama Maddesi Olarak Yaz\u0131lmas\u0131 Suretiyle CMK’n\u0131n 232\/6. Md. ve F\u0131kras\u0131na Uyulmamas\u0131n\u0131n Do\u011fru G\u00f6r\u00fclmedi\u011fi )<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n \u2022 SU\u00c7UN SANIK TARAFINDAN \u0130\u015eLEND\u0130\u011e\u0130N\u0130N SAB\u0130T OLMAMASI ( Gerek\u00e7esiyle Beraat Karar\u0131 Verilirken CMK’n\u0131n 223\/2-E Md. F\u0131kra ve Bendinin Yan\u0131nda Ayn\u0131 Kanunun 223\/2-C Md. F\u0131kra ve Bendinin de Uygulama Maddesi Olarak Yaz\u0131lmas\u0131 Suretiyle CMK’n\u0131n 232\/6. Md. ve F\u0131kras\u0131na Uyulmamas\u0131n\u0131n \u0130sabetsiz Oldu\u011fu – Bili\u015fim Sistemine Girme ve Haberle\u015fmenin Gizlili\u011fini \u0130hlal )<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n 5237\/m.<\/strong>132<\/strong><\/a>,<\/strong>243<\/strong><\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n 5271\/m.<\/strong>223<\/strong><\/a>\/2-c-e,<\/strong>232<\/strong><\/a>\/6<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n \u00d6ZET : <\/strong>Dava; bili\u015fim sistemine girme ve haberle\u015fmenin gizlili\u011fini ihlal su\u00e7lar\u0131na ili\u015fkindir. San\u0131\u011fa y\u00fcklenen su\u00e7lar\u0131n san\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan i\u015flendi\u011finin sabit olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle beraat karar\u0131 verilirken, CMK’n\u0131n 223<\/a>\/2-e madde, f\u0131kra ve bendinin yan\u0131nda, ayn\u0131 Kanunun 223\/2-c madde, f\u0131kra ve bendinin de uygulama maddesi olarak yaz\u0131lmas\u0131 suretiyle CMK’n\u0131n 232<\/a>\/6. madde ve f\u0131kras\u0131na uyulmamas\u0131 bozma nedenidir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n DAVA : <\/strong>Bili\u015fim sistemine girme ve haberle\u015fmenin gizlili\u011fini ihlal su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan san\u0131\u011f\u0131n beraatine ili\u015fkin h\u00fck\u00fcmler, kat\u0131lanlar vekili taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmekle, dosya incelenerek gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n\n\n\n KARAR : <\/strong>Ma\u011fdur …’\u0131n yetkilisi oldu\u011fu firmada finans m\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fc olarak \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmakta iken istifa eden ve daha sonra i\u015f mahkemesinde i\u015fe iade davas\u0131 a\u00e7an san\u0131k …’\u0131n, firman\u0131n muhasebe m\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fc olan di\u011fer ma\u011fdur …’e \u015firket taraf\u0131ndan tahsis edilen elektronik posta hesab\u0131na, yetkisiz eri\u015fim sa\u011flay\u0131p, ma\u011fdurlar aras\u0131ndaki elektronik iletileri, kendi kullan\u0131m\u0131ndaki elektronik posta hesab\u0131na g\u00f6nderdikten sonra, s\u00f6z konusu elektronik iletileri, i\u015f mahkemesindeki dava dosyas\u0131na sunarak, TCK’n\u0131n 243<\/a>\/1. madde ve f\u0131kras\u0131ndaki bili\u015fim sistemine girme ile TCK’n\u0131n 132<\/a>\/1 ve 132<\/a>\/2. madde ve f\u0131kralar\u0131ndaki haberle\u015fmenin gizlili\u011fini ihlal su\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 i\u015fledi\u011finin iddia edildi\u011fi olayda;<\/p>\n\n\n\n San\u0131k …’\u0131n; bedelli askerlik uygulamas\u0131 i\u00e7in firmadan 30.000,00 TL tutar\u0131nda avans istedi\u011fini, kendisine yap\u0131lacak \u00f6demenin k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131na mahsuben yap\u0131laca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n, bu nedenle i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131k\u0131\u015f ve tekrar i\u015fe giri\u015f yap\u0131laca\u011f\u0131n\u0131n s\u00f6ylendi\u011fini, bu ama\u00e7la 31.08.2012 tarihinde istifa etti\u011fine dair dilek\u00e7eyi ve ayn\u0131 tarihli ibranameyi imzalad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, i\u015ften \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen i\u015fe tekrar giri\u015finin yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, 17.09.2012 tarihinde ise hi\u00e7bir neden g\u00f6sterilmeksizin i\u015f akdinin fesh edilip, \u015firkete ait elektronik posta hesaplar\u0131na eri\u015fiminin de engellendi\u011fini, 18-19.09.2012 tarihlerinde ayn\u0131 departmanda beraber \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 ma\u011fdur …’\u00fc telefonla aray\u0131p, firmaya kar\u015f\u0131 dava a\u00e7aca\u011f\u0131n\u0131, imzalad\u0131\u011f\u0131 istifa dilek\u00e7esi ile ibranameyi ve konuya ili\u015fkin firma ile aras\u0131nda ge\u00e7en elektronik iletileri istedi\u011fini, ma\u011fdur …’\u00fcn \u201cBeni bu i\u015flere kar\u0131\u015ft\u0131rma, zaten benim elektronik posta adresimi biliyorsun, oradan girip al\u201d dedi\u011fini, bunun \u00fczerine 20-22.09.2012 tarihleri aras\u0131nda ma\u011fdur …’e \u015firket taraf\u0131ndan tahsis edilen elektronik posta hesab\u0131na \u00f6nceden bildi\u011fi \u015fifreyle giri\u015f yap\u0131p, temin etti\u011fi istifa dilek\u00e7esi ve ibraname ile iddialar\u0131na ili\u015fkin s\u00fcreci destekler nitelikteki elektronik iletileri, i\u015f mahkemesindeki 27.09.2012 tarihli dava dosyas\u0131na sundu\u011funu beyan etmesi, ma\u011fdur …’\u00fcn, \u201c… M. … \u015firketten ayr\u0131ld\u0131ktan sonra benimle … irtibat kurarak kendisinin \u015firketteki g\u00f6revinden tekrar geri i\u015fe al\u0131naca\u011f\u0131 vaadiyle istifa etti\u011fini; fakat, i\u015fe al\u0131nmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, bu nedenle istifa dilek\u00e7esiyle ibranamesinin bir kopyas\u0131n\u0131 istedi\u011fini s\u00f6yledi, ben \u015firkette muhasebede personel i\u015flerini takip etti\u011fim i\u00e7in bu belgelerin as\u0131llar\u0131n\u0131n benim eri\u015fimimde oldu\u011funu biliyordu… kendisine bu durum \u015firketle senin aranda bir sorun, bu belgeleri sana veremem, bu durumu gerekirse patronlarla g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f dedim. Benim bu tavr\u0131m \u00fczerine … talep etti\u011fi bu belgeleri bir \u015fekilde ele ge\u00e7irece\u011fini ve ele ge\u00e7irdikten sonra da benden ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6ylemek suretiyle beni de zor durumda b\u0131rakaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yleyerek… benimle yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmeyi sonland\u0131rd\u0131. Aradan ge\u00e7en bir s\u00fcre sonra… \u015firket aleyhine a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u015f mahkemesindeki davada benim \u015firket i\u00e7erisinde kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131m e-posta hesab\u0131ma yine \u015firket i\u00e7erisindeki di\u011fer ki\u015filerle yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131m \u00f6zellikle \u015f\u00fcpheliyi ilgilendiren e-posta ileti \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131n delil olarak sunuldu\u011funu \u00f6\u011frendim. Ben \u015f\u00fcpheliye hi\u00e7bir \u015fekilde kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131m e-posta hesab\u0131ma ait \u015fifreleri vermedim. Nas\u0131l \u00f6\u011frendi\u011fi konusunda da bilgim yoktur. Benim e-posta hesab\u0131ma ait \u015fifrelerim kolay tahmin edilebilecek nitelikte de de\u011fildi; fakat, \u015f\u00fcpheli belki benimle birlikte bulundu\u011fu ortamlarda bu \u015fifremi yazarken tespit etmi\u015f olabilir. Benim e-posta hesab\u0131ma eri\u015fim sa\u011flad\u0131ktan sonra herhangi bir de\u011fi\u015fiklik yapmam\u0131\u015f, ben bu \u015fekilde kullanmaya devam ettim, olaydan haberdar olunca \u015fifremi de\u011fi\u015ftirerek g\u00fcncelledim…\u201d; \u201c…san\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015filerle yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131m g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmelere girip girmedi\u011fini tespit edemedim…\u201d ve ma\u011fdur …’\u0131n \u201c…\u015eirket d\u0131\u015f\u0131ndan elektronik posta hesaplar\u0131na eri\u015fim yapabilmesi i\u00e7in \u00f6ncelikle \u015firketimizin web sayfas\u0131na daha \u00f6nceden tan\u0131mlanm\u0131\u015f kullan\u0131c\u0131 ad\u0131 ve \u015fifre kullan\u0131larak giri\u015f yap\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekmektedir. Soru\u015fturma konusu elektronik posta yaz\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131 ile ilgili \u015f\u00fcpheli taraf\u0131ndan ne \u015fekilde eri\u015fim sa\u011fland\u0131\u011f\u0131 ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131nda web sayfas\u0131na kendi kullan\u0131c\u0131 ad\u0131 ve \u015fifresi ile giri\u015f yapt\u0131ktan sonra \u00d6.’\u00fcn e-posta hesab\u0131na eri\u015fim sa\u011flad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 tespit ettik…\u201d bi\u00e7imindeki ifadelerinden, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n ma\u011fdur …’\u00fc telefonla aray\u0131p \u00f6ncelikle belge \u00f6rneklerini ondan talep etti\u011finin ve telefonda ya\u015fanan tart\u0131\u015fmaya ra\u011fmen ma\u011fdur …’\u00fcn \u015fifresini de\u011fi\u015ftirmemesinden dolay\u0131 onun \u015fifresini bildi\u011fi elektronik posta hesab\u0131na girdi\u011finin anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131, san\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan a\u00e7\u0131lan i\u015f davas\u0131n\u0131n reddine ili\u015fkin yerel mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131n, Yarg\u0131tay 9. Hukuk Dairesinin 22.05.2014 tarihli, 2014\/3243 esas, 2014\/16502 karar say\u0131l\u0131 ilam\u0131 ile \u201c…Taraflar aras\u0131ndaki uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k davac\u0131n\u0131n i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin istifa ile sona erip ermedi\u011fi noktas\u0131ndad\u0131r. Somut olayda daval\u0131 davac\u0131n\u0131n istifa ederek i\u015ften ayr\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 davac\u0131n\u0131n bedelli askerli\u011fe m\u00fcracaat etti\u011fini, bu kapsamda \u015firket taraf\u0131ndan kendisine 30.000 TL \u00f6demede bulunuldu\u011funu, davac\u0131n\u0131n kendi i\u015fini kurmak amac\u0131yla i\u015ften ayr\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek davan\u0131n reddini talep etmi\u015f, davac\u0131n\u0131n 31.08.2012 tarihli istifa dilek\u00e7esini ve ayn\u0131 tarihli ibranamesini sunmu\u015ftur. Davac\u0131 ise \u015firket taraf\u0131ndan kendisine \u00f6denen bedelli askerlik tutar\u0131n\u0131n k\u0131dem tazminat\u0131 \u00f6demesi olarak muhasebele\u015ftirilmesi ve ilgili kay\u0131tlara i\u015flenebilmesi amac\u0131yla giri\u015f \u00e7\u0131k\u0131\u015f yap\u0131lmas\u0131 i\u00e7in s\u00f6z konusu dilek\u00e7enin kendisinden al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 iddia etmi\u015ftir. Ger\u00e7ekten daval\u0131 tan\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131 \u00d6. … ifadesinde davac\u0131n\u0131n i\u015f akdinin feshedildi\u011fini sonra i\u015fe geri al\u0131nmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, zannetti\u011fi kadar\u0131yla davac\u0131 ba\u015fvurmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in i\u015fe al\u0131nmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 beyan etti\u011fi, ayr\u0131ca davac\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7\u0131k\u0131\u015f\u0131n\u0131n dahi 31.08.2012 tarihi itibariyle de\u011fil istifa dilek\u00e7esi verildikten 17 g\u00fcn sonra 17.09.2012 tarihinde yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, daval\u0131 davac\u0131 istifa dilek\u00e7esi verildikten sonra kendisiyle iki hafta daha \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 konusunda anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtmi\u015fse de bu konuda herhangi somut ve inand\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 bir delil de sunulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, sunulan dilek\u00e7ede herhangi bir ihbar \u00f6nelinin bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, i\u015f ili\u015fkisi devam ederken bu \u015fekilde al\u0131nan istifa dilek\u00e7esine itibar edilemeyece\u011fi buna g\u00f6re davac\u0131n\u0131n i\u015f s\u00f6zle\u015fmesinin i\u015fveren taraf\u0131ndan feshedildi\u011fi ancak feshin haks\u0131z ve ge\u00e7ersiz oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan davan\u0131n kabul\u00fc yerine yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde reddine karar verilmesi hatal\u0131d\u0131r.\u201d gerek\u00e7esine dayal\u0131 olarak bozulmas\u0131, dosyada mevcut i\u015f mahkemesine sunulan elektronik iletilerin bir k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131n taraf\u0131 san\u0131k olup, elektronik ileti i\u00e7eriklerinin san\u0131\u011f\u0131n savunmas\u0131n\u0131 do\u011frulamas\u0131, \u015fikayete konu elektronik iletilerin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015fi ya da ki\u015filerle payla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve\/veya \u00e7o\u011falt\u0131larak da\u011f\u0131t\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin bir iddian\u0131n olmamas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n, kendisinin kand\u0131r\u0131l\u0131p, istifa ettirilerek, i\u015f akdinin haks\u0131z \u015fekilde fesh edilmesinin ve ya\u015fad\u0131\u011f\u0131 s\u00fcreci ispatlayan belgelerin taraf\u0131na verilmemesinin ard\u0131ndan, sadece kendisine ili\u015fkin s\u00fcre\u00e7le ilgili elektronik iletileri temin edip, i\u015f mahkemesindeki iddialar\u0131n\u0131 ispatlama ve kaybolma olas\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 bulunan delillerin muhafazas\u0131n\u0131 sa\u011flama amac\u0131n\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131yan eylemlerinde, hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 hareket etti\u011fi bilinciyle davranmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na ve ma\u011fdur …’\u00fcn r\u0131zas\u0131n\u0131 alarak elektronik posta hesab\u0131na girdi\u011fine dair savunmas\u0131n\u0131n aksine, mahkumiyetine yeter, her t\u00fcrl\u00fc derecede \u015f\u00fcpheden uzak, kesin ve inand\u0131r\u0131c\u0131 delil bulunmamas\u0131 nedeniyle san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda beraat karar\u0131 verilmesine ili\u015fkin yerel mahkemenin kabul\u00fcnde dosya kapsam\u0131na g\u00f6re bir isabetsizlik g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015f; san\u0131k hakk\u0131nda bili\u015fim sistemine girme ve haberle\u015fmenin gizlili\u011fini ihlal su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan mahkumiyet karar\u0131 verilmesi gerekti\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncesiyle beraat h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin bozulmas\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6neren tebli\u011fnamedeki g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fe i\u015ftirak edilmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Mahkemece 26.01.2016 tarihinde tefhim edilen karar\u0131 yasal s\u00fcresi i\u00e7inde temyiz etmeyen san\u0131k m\u00fcdafii, 15.03.2016 tarihli temyize ve 09.01.2019 tarihli tebli\u011fnameye cevap dilek\u00e7elerinde; hakk\u0131nda beraat karar\u0131 verilen ve kendisini vekil ile temsil ettiren san\u0131k yarar\u0131na, hazine aleyhine, karar tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte bulunan Avukatl\u0131k Asgari \u00dccret Tarifesi gere\u011fince maktu vekalet \u00fccretine h\u00fckmedilmemesi nedeniyle h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin d\u00fczeltilerek onanmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini ifade etmi\u015f ve san\u0131k lehine vekalet \u00fccreti h\u00fckmolunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ise de, Yarg\u0131tay Ceza Genel Kurulunun 07.05.2013 tarihli, 2013\/11-87-245 Say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131nda da vurguland\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00fczere; vekalet \u00fccreti ki\u015fisel hakka ili\u015fkin olup, ki\u015fisel hakka ili\u015fkin kanuna ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131klar\u0131n Yarg\u0131tay taraf\u0131ndan bozma konusu yap\u0131labilmesi i\u00e7in, h\u00fckm\u00fcn kar\u015f\u0131 hak sahibi taraf\u0131ndan temyiz edilmi\u015f olmas\u0131 gerekti\u011finden, temyiz edenin s\u0131fat\u0131na g\u00f6re, bu husus bozma sebebi olarak kabul edilmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Adli emanete al\u0131nan 2 adet hard disk hakk\u0131nda bir karar verilmemesi, bu konuda mahkemesinden her zaman bir karar al\u0131nmas\u0131 olanakl\u0131 oldu\u011fundan, bozma nedeni yap\u0131lmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lama sonunda, y\u00fcklenen su\u00e7lar\u0131n san\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan i\u015flendi\u011finin sabit olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7eleri g\u00f6sterilerek mahkemece kabul ve takdir k\u0131l\u0131nm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fundan, kat\u0131lanlar vekilinin s\u00fcbuta, san\u0131\u011fa y\u00fcklenen su\u00e7lar\u0131n unsurlar\u0131n\u0131n olu\u015ftu\u011funa, ele ge\u00e7irilen elektronik iletilerin i\u015f mahkemesindeki davayla ilgisi bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6zetilmeden eksik incelemeyle karar verildi\u011fine ili\u015fkin sair temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131n reddine, ancak;<\/p>\n\n\n\n San\u0131\u011fa y\u00fcklenen su\u00e7lar\u0131n san\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan i\u015flendi\u011finin sabit olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle beraat karar\u0131 verilirken, CMK’n\u0131n 223<\/a>\/2-e madde, f\u0131kra ve bendinin yan\u0131nda, ayn\u0131 Kanunun 223\/2-c madde, f\u0131kra ve bendinin de uygulama maddesi olarak yaz\u0131lmas\u0131 suretiyle CMK’n\u0131n 232<\/a>\/6. madde ve f\u0131kras\u0131na uyulmamas\u0131,<\/p>\n\n\n\n SONU\u00c7 : <\/strong>Kanuna ayk\u0131r\u0131 olup, kat\u0131lanlar vekilinin temyiz itirazlar\u0131 bu itibarla yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden, h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin bu nedenle 5320 Say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 8<\/a>. maddesi uyar\u0131nca halen uygulanmakta olan 1412 Say\u0131l\u0131 CMUK’un 321<\/a>. maddesi gere\u011fince BOZULMASINA; ancak, yeniden yarg\u0131lama gerektirmeyen bu konuda, ayn\u0131 Kanunun 322. maddesi gere\u011fince karar verilmesi m\u00fcmk\u00fcn bulundu\u011fundan, ayn\u0131 maddenin verdi\u011fi yetkiye istinaden; gerek\u00e7eli karardaki \u201csan\u0131\u011f\u0131n CMK 223\/2-c-e maddesi gere\u011fince beraatine\u201d ibarelerinin ve h\u00fck\u00fcm f\u0131kras\u0131n\u0131n ilk paragraf\u0131n\u0131n, \u201cSan\u0131k hakk\u0131nda TCK’n\u0131n 243<\/a>\/1. madde ve f\u0131kras\u0131ndaki bili\u015fim sistemine girme ile TCK’n\u0131n 132<\/a>\/1 ve 132<\/a>\/2. madde ve f\u0131kralar\u0131ndaki haberle\u015fmenin gizlili\u011fini ihlal su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan a\u00e7\u0131lan davalar\u0131n yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lamas\u0131 sonunda, san\u0131\u011fa y\u00fcklenen su\u00e7lar\u0131n san\u0131k taraf\u0131ndan i\u015flendi\u011finin sabit olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, CMK’n\u0131n 223<\/a>\/2-e madde, f\u0131kra ve bendi gere\u011fince san\u0131\u011f\u0131n beraatine\u201d \u015feklinde de\u011fi\u015ftirilmesi suretiyle, ele\u015ftiri d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda, sair y\u00f6nleri usul ve kanuna uygun bulunan h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin D\u00dcZELT\u0130LEREK ONANMASINA, 25.09.2019 tarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Kaynak: Kazanc\u0131 \u0130\u00e7tihat Program\u0131<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Bili\u015fim su\u00e7lar\u0131 ve ceza hukuku alan\u0131nda (haberle\u015fmenin gizlili\u011fini ihlal su\u00e7u: TCK 132) avukatlar\u0131n da i\u015fine yarayabilecek bir karar\u0131 payla\u015f\u0131yorum. Avukat Do\u00e7. Dr. \u015eaban Cankat TA\u015eKIN, Bursa Barosu T.C. YARGITAY 12. CEZA DA\u0130RES\u0130 E. 2018\/8586 K. 2019\/9340 T. 25.9.2019 \u2022 B\u0130L\u0130\u015e\u0130M … Okumaya devam et