Bili\u015fim su\u00e7lar\u0131 ve ceza hukuku alan\u0131nda (haberle\u015fmenin gizlili\u011fini ihlal su\u00e7u: TCK 132) avukatlar\u0131n da i\u015fine yarayabilecek bir karar\u0131 payla\u015f\u0131yorum.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Avukat Do\u00e7. Dr. \u015eaban Cankat TA\u015eKIN, Bursa Barosu<\/p>\n\n\n\n
<\/p>\n\n\n\n
T.C.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n YARGITAY<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n 13. CEZA DA\u0130RES\u0130<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n E. 2014\/10489<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n K. 2014\/25006<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n T. 10.9.2014<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n \u2022 HIRSIZLIK SU\u00c7U ( M\u00fc\u015ftekinin \u015e\u00fcphelendi\u011fi Ki\u015finin Gizlice Ses ve G\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fc Kay\u0131tlar\u0131n\u0131 Ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 – San\u0131\u011f\u0131n \u0130kinci H\u0131rs\u0131zl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ile \u0130lgili Su\u00e7unu \u0130krar\u0131n\u0131 da \u0130\u00e7eren Ses ve G\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fc Kay\u0131tlar\u0131n\u0131n Hukuka Ayk\u0131r\u0131 Bir Delil Olup Olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n Yerel Mahkemece \u0130rdelenmesi Gere\u011fi )<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n \u2022 SANI\u011eIN G\u0130ZL\u0130CE SES VE G\u00d6R\u00dcNT\u00dcS\u00dcN\u00dcN KAYDA ALINMASI ( San\u0131\u011f\u0131n 200 TL nin \u00c7al\u0131nmas\u0131yla \u0130lgili \u0130krar\u0131 Bulundu\u011fu\/H\u0131rs\u0131zl\u0131k Su\u00e7unun S\u00fcbuta Erdi\u011fi – Mahkemece San\u0131k Hakk\u0131nda Mahkumiyet Yerine Beraat Karar\u0131 Verilmesinin Hatal\u0131 Oldu\u011fu\/Delilleri Takdir Yetkisi )<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n \u2022 HIRSIZLIK SU\u00c7UNUN \u0130KRARINI \u0130\u00c7EREN SES VE G\u00d6R\u00dcNT\u00dc ( Cep Telefonu ile Gizlice \u00c7ekildi\u011fi – Hukuka Uygunlu\u011funun Ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 )<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n \u2022 SANI\u011eIN TELEKOM\u0130N\u0130KASYON YOLUYLA YAPTI\u011eI \u0130LET\u0130\u015e\u0130M\u0130N DENETLENMES\u0130 ( Belli Ko\u015fullara Ba\u011fland\u0131\u011f\u0131 – Delillerin Hukuka Uygunlu\u011funun Denetlenece\u011fi\/H\u00fckme Esas Al\u0131nacak Delillerin Hukuka Uygun Olmas\u0131 Gere\u011fi\/H\u0131rs\u0131zl\u0131k Su\u00e7u\/Delillerin Takdiri\/Hukuka Ayk\u0131r\u0131 Delil )<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n \u2022 HUKUKA AYKIRI DEL\u0130L ( M\u00fc\u015fteki Taraf\u0131ndan Eve \u00c7a\u011fr\u0131lan San\u0131kla Yap\u0131lan Konu\u015fma S\u0131ras\u0131nda Gizlice Cep Telefonuna Kaydedilen \u0130krar\u0131 \u0130\u00e7eren Ses ve G\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fc Kay\u0131tlar\u0131n\u0131n Hukuka Uygunlu\u011funun Yerel Mahkemece \u0130rdelenmesi Gere\u011fi – Gizlice Kaydedilen Ses ve G\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fc )<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n 5237\/m. <\/strong>132<\/strong><\/a>,<\/strong>133<\/strong><\/a>,<\/strong>134<\/strong><\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n 5271\/m. <\/strong>206<\/strong><\/a>,<\/strong>217<\/strong><\/a>\/2<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n \u00d6ZET : <\/strong>H\u0131rs\u0131zl\u0131k su\u00e7undan yap\u0131lan yarg\u0131lamada, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n m\u00fc\u015ftekinin evinde temizlik\u00e7i, e\u015fi olan di\u011fer san\u0131\u011f\u0131n ise \u015fof\u00f6r olarak \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131, evden 13.000 TL ve 100 ABD Dolar\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n farkedilmesi \u00fczerine, m\u00fc\u015fteki taraf\u0131ndan san\u0131ktan \u015f\u00fcphelenilerek \u00e7ekmeceye seri numaralar\u0131 al\u0131n\u0131p 700 TL para b\u0131rak\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, daha sonradan paran\u0131n 200 TL’sinin \u00e7al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 \u00fczerine san\u0131\u011f\u0131n m\u00fc\u015fteki taraf\u0131ndan eve \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131larak kendisiyle konu\u015fuldu\u011fu, bu g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fc ve konu\u015fmalar\u0131n gizlice m\u00fc\u015ftekiye ait cep telefonuna kaydedildi\u011fi olayda; \u00f6ncelikle m\u00fc\u015ftekinin delil olarak sundu\u011fu ve san\u0131\u011f\u0131n; e\u015finin olaya dahli olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, kendisinin de \u00f6nceki h\u0131rs\u0131zl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ink\u00e2r etmekle birlikte daha sonraki h\u0131rs\u0131zl\u0131k su\u00e7unu ikrar\u0131 i\u00e7eren ses ve g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fc kayd\u0131n\u0131n hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 bir delil olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n irdelenmelidir.Ayr\u0131ca, \u015e\u00fcpheli ve san\u0131\u011f\u0131n telekom\u00fcnikasyon yoluyla yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 ileti\u015fimin denetlenmesinin belli ko\u015fullara ba\u011fland\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve y\u00fcklenen su\u00e7un hukuka uygun bir \u015fekilde elde edilmi\u015f her t\u00fcrl\u00fc delille ispat edilebilece\u011fi cihetle \u015fikayet\u00e7i taraf\u0131ndan eve \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131lan san\u0131kla yap\u0131lan konu\u015fma s\u0131ras\u0131nda gizlice cep telefonuna kaydedilen ikrar\u0131 i\u00e7eren ses ve g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fc kay\u0131tlar\u0131n\u0131n hukuka uygun olarak elde edilmemesi nedeniyle h\u00fckme esas al\u0131namayaca\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6zetilmelidir.San\u0131\u011f\u0131n m\u00fc\u015ftekinin evinden \u00e7ekmeceye konulan 700 TL paran\u0131n 200 TL’sini \u00e7almak suretiyle h\u0131rs\u0131zl\u0131k su\u00e7unu i\u015fledi\u011fi subuta erdi\u011fi h\u00e2lde, mahk\u00fbmiyeti yerine beraatine karar verilmesi bozma nedenidir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n DAVA : <\/strong>Mahalli mahkemece verilen h\u00fck\u00fcm temyiz edilmekle dosya incelenerek, gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n\n\n\n KARAR : <\/strong>1- ) San\u0131k Erc\u00fcment hakk\u0131nda h\u0131rs\u0131zl\u0131k su\u00e7undan verilen beraat h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn yap\u0131lan incelemesinde;<\/p>\n\n\n\n Dosya ve duru\u015fma tutanaklar\u0131 i\u00e7eri\u011fine, karar\u0131n dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 gerek\u00e7eye ve takdire g\u00f6re, kat\u0131lan vekilinin temyiz itiraz\u0131 yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015f oldu\u011fundan reddiyle usul ve kanuna uygun ve takdire dayal\u0131 bulunan h\u00fckm\u00fcn ONANMASINA,<\/p>\n\n\n\n 2- ) San\u0131k G\u00fcnay hakk\u0131nda h\u0131rs\u0131zl\u0131k su\u00e7undan verilen beraat h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn yap\u0131lan incelemesinde;<\/p>\n\n\n\n San\u0131\u011f\u0131n m\u00fc\u015ftekinin evinde temizlik\u00e7i, e\u015fi olan di\u011fer san\u0131\u011f\u0131n ise \u015fof\u00f6r olarak \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131, 12.12.2011 tarihinde evden 13.000 TL ve 100 ABD Dolar\u0131n\u0131n \u00e7al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n farkedilmesi \u00fczerine, m\u00fc\u015fteki taraf\u0131ndan san\u0131k G\u00fcnay’dan \u015f\u00fcphelenilerek \u00e7ekmeceye seri numaralar\u0131 al\u0131n\u0131p 700 TL para b\u0131rak\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, 16.12.2011 g\u00fcn\u00fc san\u0131k evden ayr\u0131ld\u0131ktan sonra paran\u0131n 200 TL’sinin \u00e7al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 \u00fczerine san\u0131\u011f\u0131n m\u00fc\u015fteki taraf\u0131ndan eve \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131larak kendisiyle konu\u015fuldu\u011fu, bu g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fc ve konu\u015fmalar\u0131n gizlice m\u00fc\u015ftekiye ait cep telefonuna kaydedildi\u011fi olayda; \u00f6ncelikle m\u00fc\u015ftekinin delil olarak sundu\u011fu ve san\u0131\u011f\u0131n; e\u015finin olaya dahli olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, kendisinin de \u00f6nceki h\u0131rs\u0131zl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ink\u00e2r etmekle birlikte 16.12.2011 tarihindeki su\u00e7u ikrar\u0131 i\u00e7eren ses ve g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fc kayd\u0131n\u0131n hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 bir delil olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n irdelenmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Buna ek olarak m\u00fc\u015ftekinin, 12.12.2011 tarihinde i\u015flenen h\u0131rs\u0131zl\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u015f\u00fcphelendi\u011fi san\u0131klar\u0131n i\u015fleyip i\u015flemedi\u011fini tespit maksad\u0131yla … seri numaralar\u0131 al\u0131n\u0131p \u00e7ekmeceye 700 TL b\u0131rakt\u0131\u011f\u0131na, bunun i\u00e7inden 200 TL’nin eksildi\u011fine, b\u0131rakma ve eksilme aras\u0131nda ge\u00e7en s\u00fcrede olay\u0131n ge\u00e7ti\u011fi m\u00fc\u015ftekiye ait eve san\u0131k G\u00fcnay’dan ba\u015fka hi\u00e7bir kimsenin gelmedi\u011fine dair beyan ve iddias\u0131, tan\u0131k F. B.’\u0131n g\u00f6rg\u00fcye dayal\u0131 yeminli beyan\u0131yla do\u011frulanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 5237 say\u0131l\u0131 TCK’n\u0131n 132<\/a>. maddesi ve devam\u0131 h\u00fck\u00fcmleri uyar\u0131nca, \u00f6zel hayat\u0131n gizlili\u011fini ihl\u00e2l ve bu meyanda ki\u015filerin \u00f6zel hayat\u0131na ili\u015fkin ses ve g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fclerin r\u0131zalar\u0131 olmaks\u0131z\u0131n kayda al\u0131nmas\u0131, if\u015fa edilmesi su\u00e7 olarak d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 CMK’n\u0131n 135<\/a>. maddesi ve devam\u0131 h\u00fck\u00fcmleri uyar\u0131nca, \u015f\u00fcpheli ve san\u0131\u011f\u0131n telekom\u00fcnikasyon yoluyla yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 ileti\u015fiminin denetlenmesi belli ko\u015fullara ba\u011flanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Ayn\u0131 Kanun’un 206 ve 217\/2. maddeleri uyar\u0131nca Y\u00fcklenen su\u00e7, hukuka uygun bir \u015fekilde elde edilmi\u015f her t\u00fcrl\u00fc delille ispat edilebilir denilmektedir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Bu itibarla;<\/p>\n\n\n\n Dosyaya delil olarak sunulan ses ve g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fc kay\u0131tlar\u0131 hukuka uygun olarak elde edilmedi\u011finden h\u00fckme esas al\u0131namaz ise de. m\u00fc\u015fteki S. S.’\u0131n iddias\u0131 ve annesi tan\u0131k F.B.’\u0131n yeminli beyan\u0131na g\u00f6re, san\u0131k G\u00fcnay’\u0131n m\u00fc\u015ftekinin evinden 16.12.2011 tarihinde \u00e7ekmeceye konulan 700 TL paran\u0131n 200 TL’sini \u00e7almak suretiyle h\u0131rs\u0131zl\u0131k su\u00e7unu i\u015fledi\u011fi subuta erdi\u011fi h\u00e2lde, mahk\u00fbmiyeti yerine beraatine karar verilmesi;<\/p>\n\n\n\n SONU\u00c7 : <\/strong>Bozmay\u0131 gerektirmi\u015f, kat\u0131lan vekilinin temyiz itirazlar\u0131 bu itibarla yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f oldu\u011fundan, h\u00fckm\u00fcn a\u00e7\u0131klanan nedenle gerek\u00e7e y\u00f6n\u00fcnden k\u0131smen tebli\u011fnameye ayk\u0131r\u0131 olarak BOZULMASINA, 10.09.2014 tarihinde oybirli\u011fi ile karar verildi.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Kaynak: Kazanc\u0131 \u0130\u00e7tihat Program\u0131<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Bili\u015fim su\u00e7lar\u0131 ve ceza hukuku alan\u0131nda (haberle\u015fmenin gizlili\u011fini ihlal su\u00e7u: TCK 132) avukatlar\u0131n da i\u015fine yarayabilecek bir karar\u0131 payla\u015f\u0131yorum. Avukat Do\u00e7. Dr. \u015eaban Cankat TA\u015eKIN, Bursa Barosu T.C. YARGITAY 13. CEZA DA\u0130RES\u0130 E. 2014\/10489 K. 2014\/25006 T. 10.9.2014 \u2022 HIRSIZLIK … Okumaya devam et