Bili\u015fim su\u00e7lar\u0131 ve ceza hukuku alan\u0131nda (haberle\u015fmenin gizlili\u011fini ihlal su\u00e7u: TCK 132) avukatlar\u0131n da i\u015fine yarayabilecek bir karar\u0131 payla\u015f\u0131yorum.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Avukat Do\u00e7. Dr. \u015eaban Cankat TA\u015eKIN, Bursa Barosu<\/p>\n\n\n\n
T.C.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n YARGITAY<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n 12. CEZA DA\u0130RES\u0130<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n E. 2011\/7330<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n K. 2012\/407<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n T. 18.1.2012<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n \u2022 HABERLE\u015eMEN\u0130N G\u0130ZL\u0130L\u0130\u011e\u0130N\u0130 \u0130HLAL (Su\u00e7un Takibinin \u015eikayete Tabi Oldu\u011fu\/\u00d6len Ki\u015filer \u0130\u00e7in D\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fclemeyece\u011fi – \u00d6zel Hayat\u0131n Gizlili\u011fini \u0130hlal)<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n \u2022 \u00d6ZEL HAYATIN G\u0130ZL\u0130L\u0130\u011e\u0130N\u0130 \u0130HLAL (Haberle\u015fmenin Gizlili\u011fini \u0130hlal – M\u00fcteveffan\u0131n Miras\u00e7\u0131s\u0131 M\u00fc\u015ftekilerin \u00d6zel Hayatlar\u0131na \u0130li\u015fkin Bilginin Bulunmamas\u0131 Sonucu Su\u00e7un Unsurlar\u0131n\u0131n Olu\u015fmayaca\u011f\u0131\/Su\u00e7un Takibinin \u015eikayete Tabi Oldu\u011fu\/\u00d6len Ki\u015filer \u0130\u00e7in D\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fclemeyece\u011fi)<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n \u2022 MEKTUPLARIN YAYINLANMASI (\u00d6zel Hayat\u0131n Gizlili\u011fini \u0130hlal – M\u00fczayedeyi Yapan \u015eirketten Dijital Ortamda Temin Edilen Mektup Kopyalar\u0131n\u0131n Yay\u0131nlanmas\u0131 ve As\u0131llar\u0131n\u0131n Bulunmamas\u0131 Nedeniyle 2863 S.K’nun 23 \/son Md. Kapsam\u0131nda De\u011ferlendirilemeyece\u011fi)<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n \u2022 K\u00dcLT\u00dcR VE TAB\u0130AT VARLIKLARININ KORUNMASI (M\u00fczayedeyi Yapan \u015eirketten Dijital Ortamda Temin Edilen Mektup Kopyalar\u0131n\u0131n Yay\u0131nlanmas\u0131 ve As\u0131llar\u0131n\u0131n Bulunmamas\u0131 Nedeniyle 2863 S.K’nun 23 \/son Md. Kapsam\u0131nda De\u011ferlendirilemeyece\u011fi – Haberle\u015fmenin Gizlili\u011fini \u0130hlal)<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n 5237\/m.<\/strong>130<\/strong><\/a>,<\/strong>132<\/strong><\/a>,<\/strong>134<\/strong><\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n 5846\/m.<\/strong>85<\/strong><\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n 2863\/m.<\/strong>23<\/strong><\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n \u00d6ZET : <\/strong>\u015eikayete tabi olup TCK’n\u0131n 132. ve 134. maddelerinde yer alan haberle\u015fmenin ve \u00f6zel hayat\u0131n gizlili\u011fini ihlal su\u00e7lar\u0131 \u00f6len ki\u015filer i\u00e7in d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fclemeyece\u011fi gibi, yay\u0131nlanan mektuplarda, m\u00fcteveffan\u0131n miras\u00e7\u0131s\u0131 m\u00fc\u015ftekilerin \u00f6zel hayatlar\u0131na ili\u015fkin bilginin de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan haberle\u015fmenin ve \u00f6zel hayat\u0131n gizlili\u011fini ihlal su\u00e7unun unsurlar\u0131 olu\u015fmamaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Ayr\u0131ca; 5846 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 85<\/a>\/1. maddesinin ihlal edildi\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fclse bile, ayn\u0131 f\u0131krada yer verilen “Me\u011fer ki, yazan\u0131n \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnden itibaren on y\u0131l ge\u00e7mi\u015f bulunsun.” h\u00fckm\u00fc nazara al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda 1975 y\u0131l\u0131nda \u00f6len muris bak\u0131m\u0131ndan maddede \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen s\u00fcre doldu\u011fundan \u015f\u00fcphelinin eylemi bu madde kapsam\u0131na girmez.<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u015e\u00fcphelinin mektuplar\u0131 yay\u0131nlamas\u0131 eyleminin de; m\u00fczayedeyi yapan \u015firketten dijital ortamda temin edilen mektup kopyalar\u0131n\u0131n yay\u0131nlanmas\u0131 ve as\u0131llar\u0131n\u0131n bulunmamas\u0131 nedeniyle 2863 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 23<\/a> \/son maddesi kapsam\u0131nda de\u011ferlendirilemeyece\u011fi g\u00f6zetilmelidir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n DAVA : <\/strong>Mektuplar\u0131n izin al\u0131nmaks\u0131z\u0131n yay\u0131nlanmas\u0131 su\u00e7undan \u015f\u00fcpheli M. G. hakk\u0131nda yap\u0131lan soru\u015fturma evresi sonucunda Beyo\u011flu Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nca d\u00fczenlenen 12.08.2009 tarihli ve 2009\/15800 soru\u015fturma, 2009\/8121 say\u0131l\u0131 kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair karara kar\u015f\u0131 yap\u0131lan itiraz\u0131n reddine ili\u015fkin mercii (Bak\u0131rk\u00f6y Birinci A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131)’nca verilen 09.09.2009 tarihli ve 2009\/277 de\u011fi\u015fik i\u015f say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 kapsayan dosya incelendi:<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u0130stanbul Emniyet M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc Mali Su\u00e7larla M\u00fccadele \u015eube M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc’ne ba\u011fl\u0131 Ka\u00e7ak\u00e7\u0131l\u0131k B\u00fcro Amirli\u011fi g\u00f6revlileri taraf\u0131ndan tarihi eser ka\u00e7ak\u00e7\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6nlemek amac\u0131yla yap\u0131lan \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmalar s\u0131ras\u0131nda, A… A.\u015e. adl\u0131 m\u00fczayede \u015firketinin 09.11.2008 tarihinde S… otel’de ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirece\u011fi 254. m\u00fczayedeye ait katalog incelendi\u011finde, “Mustafa Kemal Atat\u00fcrk’\u00fcn e\u015fi Latife Han\u0131m’a ve Latife Han\u0131m’\u0131n Mustafa Kemal Atat\u00fcrk’e yazd\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00e7ok \u00f6zel mektuplar” ba\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131 alt\u0131nda toplam 7 adet el yazmas\u0131 mektubun sat\u0131\u015fa \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tespit edilmesi \u00fczerine ilgili \u015fah\u0131slar hakk\u0131nda soru\u015fturma ba\u015flat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, \u0130stanbul \u0130kinci Sulh Ceza Mahkemesi’nin 30.10.2008 tarihli ve 2008\/1441 m\u00fcteferrik say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131na istinaden bahsi ge\u00e7en i\u015fyerinde yap\u0131lan aramada 9 sayfadan olu\u015fan 7 adet mektuba el konuldu\u011fu, bilahare 03.11.2008 tarihli tutanak ile s\u00f6z konusu belgelerin Genelkurmay Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 Askeri M\u00fcze ve K\u00fclt\u00fcr Sitesi Komutanl\u0131\u011f\u0131’na teslim edildi\u011fi, \u0130stanbul Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nca y\u00fcr\u00fct\u00fclen soru\u015fturma s\u0131ras\u0131nda bu kez an\u0131lan mektuplar\u0131n H… Gazetesi’nin 01.03.2009 ve 02.03.2009 tarihli n\u00fcshalar\u0131nda \u015f\u00fcpheli M.G\u00f6khan taraf\u0131ndan izinsiz yay\u0131nlanmas\u0131 sebebiyle Latife Han\u0131m’\u0131n miras\u00e7\u0131lar\u0131ndan G. A. vekili taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan \u015fikayet \u00fczerine ayn\u0131 dosya \u00fczerinden soru\u015fturma ba\u015flat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131,<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u0130stanbul Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nca soru\u015fturma dosyas\u0131 tefrik edilerek, mektuplar\u0131 A… A.\u015e. m\u00fczayede \u015firketine getiren S. isimli \u015fah\u0131s ile an\u0131lan \u015firketin yetkilileri H. T. ile E. haklar\u0131nda, 2863 say\u0131l\u0131 K\u00fclt\u00fcr ve Tabiat Varl\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 Koruma Kanunu’na ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131ktan kamu davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, \u015f\u00fcpheli M. G. hakk\u0131nda ise \u00f6zel hayat\u0131n ve haberle\u015fmenin gizlili\u011fini ihlal su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan soru\u015fturma yap\u0131lmak \u00fczere dosyan\u0131n yetkili Beyo\u011flu Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131’na g\u00f6nderildi\u011fi, yap\u0131lan soru\u015fturma sonucunda, 5846 say\u0131l\u0131 Fikir ve Sanat Eserleri Kanunu’nun 85<\/a>\/1. maddesinde yer alan, “Eser mahiyetinde olmasa bile, mektup, hat\u0131ra ve buna benzer yaz\u0131lar yazanlar\u0131n ve bunlar \u00f6lm\u00fc\u015f ise 19. maddenin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131nda yaz\u0131l\u0131 kimselerin muvafakati olmadan yay\u0131nlanamaz. Me\u011fer ki, yazan\u0131n \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnden itibaren on y\u0131l ge\u00e7mi\u015f bulunsun.” \u015feklindeki d\u00fczenlemeye at\u0131fta bulunularak, Mustafa Kemal Atat\u00fcrk ve e\u015fi Latife Han\u0131m’\u0131n \u00f6l\u00fcmlerinin \u00fczerinden 10 y\u0131ldan fazla s\u00fcre ge\u00e7ti\u011finden bahisle \u015f\u00fcpheli hakk\u0131nda kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair karar verildi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ise de,<\/p>\n\n\n\n Konuya ili\u015fkin mevzuat incelendi\u011finde, 2863 say\u0131l\u0131 K\u00fclt\u00fcr ve Tabiat Varl\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 Koruma Kanunu’nun, “Korunmas\u0131 gerekli ta\u015f\u0131n\u0131r k\u00fclt\u00fcr ve tabiat varl\u0131klar\u0131” ba\u015fl\u0131kl\u0131 23. maddesinin 1. f\u0131kras\u0131 (b) bendinde yer alan, “Milli tarihimizdeki \u00f6nemleri sebebiyle, Milli M\u00fccadele ve T\u00fcrkiye Cumhuriyeti’nin kurulu\u015funa ait tarihi de\u011fer ta\u015f\u0131yan belge ve e\u015fyalar, Mustafa Kemal ATAT\u00dcRK’e ait zati e\u015fya, evrak, kitap, yaz\u0131 ve benzeri ta\u015f\u0131n\u0131rlar” \u015feklindeki d\u00fczenlemeye g\u00f6re, maddede belirtilen varl\u0131klar\u0131n s\u00fcresiz koruma alt\u0131nda oldu\u011funun anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131,<\/p>\n\n\n\n Di\u011fer yandan 5846 say\u0131l\u0131 Fikir ve Sanat Eserleri Kanunu’nun 85<\/a>\/1. maddesinde yer alan, “Eser mahiyetinde olmasa bile, mektup, hat\u0131ra ve buna benzer yaz\u0131lar yazanlar\u0131n ve bunlar \u00f6lm\u00fc\u015f ise 19. maddenin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131nda yaz\u0131l\u0131 kimselerin muvafakati olmadan yay\u0131nlanamaz. Me\u011fer ki, yazan\u0131n \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnden itibaren on y\u0131l ge\u00e7mi\u015f bulunsun.” ve an\u0131lan maddenin 2. f\u0131kras\u0131nda yer alan, “Mektuplar birinci f\u0131kradaki \u015fartlardan ba\u015fka muhatap veya muhatap \u00f6lm\u00fc\u015f ise 19. maddenin birinci f\u0131kras\u0131nda yaz\u0131l\u0131 kimselerin muvafakati olmadan yay\u0131mlanamaz; me\u011fer ki, muhatab\u0131n \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnden itibaren 10 y\u0131l ge\u00e7mi\u015f bulunsun.” \u015feklindeki d\u00fczenlemelerden anla\u015f\u0131laca\u011f\u0131 \u00fczere, maddede belirtilen mektup, hat\u0131ra ve buna benzer yaz\u0131lar\u0131n yay\u0131nlanmas\u0131n\u0131n belirli \u015fartlar dahilinde m\u00fcmk\u00fcn bulundu\u011fu,<\/p>\n\n\n\n Keza an\u0131lan maddenin at\u0131fta bulundu\u011fu 19. madde incelendi\u011finde de, 1. f\u0131kras\u0131nda, “Eser sahibi 14 ve 15. maddelerin birinci f\u0131kralar\u0131yla kendisine tan\u0131nan salahiyetlerin kullan\u0131l\u0131\u015f tarzlar\u0131n\u0131 tespit etmemi\u015fse yahut bu hususu herhangi bir kimseye b\u0131rakmam\u0131\u015fsa bu salahiyetlerin \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnden sonra kullan\u0131lmas\u0131, vasiyeti tenfiz memuruna; bu tayin edilmemi\u015fse s\u0131ras\u0131yla sa\u011f kalan e\u015fi ile \u00e7ocuklar\u0131na ve mansup miras\u00e7\u0131lar\u0131na, ana-babas\u0131na, karde\u015flerine aittir.” \u015feklinde, 2. f\u0131kras\u0131nda ise, “(De\u011fi\u015fik f\u0131kra; 03\/03\/2001 – 4630\/12. md.) Eser sahibinin \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnden sonra yukar\u0131daki f\u0131krada say\u0131lan kimseler eser sahibine 14, 15 ve 16. maddelerin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kralar\u0131nda tan\u0131nan haklar\u0131 eser sahibinin \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnden itibaren yetmi\u015f y\u0131l kendi namlar\u0131na kullanabilirler.” bi\u00e7imde d\u00fczenlemelere yer verildi\u011fi,<\/p>\n\n\n\n Yine 5846 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 85<\/a>\/3. maddesinde yer alan “Yukar\u0131daki h\u00fck\u00fcmlere ayk\u0131r\u0131 hareket edenler hakk\u0131nda Bor\u00e7lar Kanunu’nun 49. maddesi ve T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanunu’nun 132, 134, 139 ve 140. maddeleri h\u00fck\u00fcmleri uygulan\u0131r.” Bi\u00e7imdeki d\u00fczenleme ile eylemin m\u00fceyyidesinin de g\u00f6sterildi\u011fi,<\/p>\n\n\n\n Somut olayda dosya kapsam\u0131nda bulunan, Genelkurmay Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 Askeri M\u00fcze ve K\u00fclt\u00fcr Sitesi Komutanl\u0131\u011f\u0131’n\u0131n 05.11.2008 tarihli ve 7820-443- 08 M\u00dcZ. GRB. say\u0131l\u0131 yaz\u0131s\u0131na ekli ekspertiz raporuna g\u00f6re, s\u00f6z konusu mektuplar\u0131n \u00f6zel hayat ile ilgili bilgiler i\u00e7erdi\u011fi ve 2863 say\u0131l\u0131 K\u00fclt\u00fcr ve Tabiat<\/p>\n\n\n\n Varl\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 Koruma Kanunu’nun 23\/b maddesi ile 30 Eyl\u00fcl 1984 tarihli ve 18531 say\u0131l\u0131 Askeri M\u00fczeler Y\u00f6netmeli\u011fi’nin 9\/1. maddesi kapsam\u0131nda “m\u00fczelik nitelikte, tasnif ve tescile tabi” \u00f6zellik ta\u015f\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ve belirtilen Y\u00f6netmeli\u011fin 15\/7. maddesi gere\u011fi, “Atat\u00fcrk’e ait zati e\u015fya, evrak, kitap, yaz\u0131, belge ve Atat\u00fcrk ile ilgili di\u011fer eserler” kapsam\u0131nda oldu\u011funun belirtilmi\u015f olmas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda,<\/p>\n\n\n\n Delillerin kamu davas\u0131n\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 gerektirir nitelikte bulundu\u011fu ve bu delillerin mahkemesince takdir ve de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekti\u011fi g\u00f6zetilmeksizin, itiraz\u0131n kabul\u00fc yerine, yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u015fekilde reddine karar verilmesinde isabet g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 5271 say\u0131l\u0131 Ceza Muhakemesi Kanunu’nun 309<\/a>. maddesi uyar\u0131nca an\u0131lan karar\u0131n bozulmas\u0131 l\u00fczumu Y\u00fcksek Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 Ceza \u0130\u015fleri Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc 27.06.2010 g\u00fcn ve B.03.0.C\u0130G.0.00.00.04-105-34-4857-2010\/7933\/ 42613 say\u0131l\u0131 kanun yarar\u0131na bozma talebine atfen, Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n 12.07.2010 g\u00fcn ve 2010\/165853 say\u0131l\u0131 tebli\u011fnamesi ile Daireye ihbar ve dava evrak\u0131 tevdii k\u0131l\u0131nmakla,<\/p>\n\n\n\n Dosya incelenerek gere\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcld\u00fc:<\/p>\n\n\n\n KARAR : <\/strong>\u015e\u00fcpheli M. G. hakk\u0131nda yaz\u0131 yazd\u0131\u011f\u0131 H… Gazetesi’nde 3 g\u00fcn s\u00fcreyle Mustafa Kemal ATAT\u00dcRK ile eski e\u015fi Latife U.’e ait 7 adet mektubun g\u00fcn\u00fcm\u00fcz T\u00fcrk\u00e7esine \u00e7evrilerek yay\u0131nlanmas\u0131 ve Latife U. miras\u00e7\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131n \u015fikayet\u00e7i olmas\u0131 \u00fczerine yap\u0131lan soru\u015fturma sonunda Beyo\u011flu Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 12.08.2009 tarih ve 2009\/15800-8121 say\u0131l\u0131 kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair karar\u0131na yap\u0131lan itiraz\u0131 inceleyen Bak\u0131rk\u00f6y Birinci A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi 09.09.2009 tarih ve 2009\/277 de\u011fi\u015fik i\u015f say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131 ile itiraz\u0131n reddine karar vermi\u015ftir. Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131’nca “delillerin kamu davas\u0131n\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 gerektirir nitelikte bulundu\u011fu ve bu delillerin mahkemesince takdir ve de\u011ferlendirilmesi gerekti\u011fi” ve b\u00f6ylece itiraz\u0131n kabul\u00fc ile kovu\u015fturmaya yer olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na dair karar\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 gerek\u00e7esiyle itiraz merciinin karar\u0131n\u0131n kanun yarar\u0131na bozulmas\u0131 talep edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u015e\u00fcphelinin m\u00fc\u015ftekilerin murisine ait mektuplar\u0131 yay\u0131nlamas\u0131n\u0131 y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte olan mevzuat bak\u0131m\u0131ndan de\u011ferlendirilmesi a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki ba\u015fl\u0131klar alt\u0131nda yap\u0131labilir:<\/p>\n\n\n\n 1- TCK’n\u0131n 130. maddesinde belirtildi\u011fi \u015fekilde \u00f6len ki\u015finin hat\u0131ras\u0131na hakaret,<\/p>\n\n\n\n 2- TCK’n\u0131n 132. maddesindeki haberle\u015fmenin gizlili\u011fini ihlal ve 134. maddesindeki \u00f6zel hayat\u0131n gizlili\u011fini ihlal,<\/p>\n\n\n\n 3- 5846 say\u0131l\u0131 Fikir ve Sanat Eserleri Kanunu’nun 85<\/a>. maddesi kapsam\u0131nda foto\u011fraflar\u0131n korunmas\u0131,<\/p>\n\n\n\n 4- 2863 say\u0131l\u0131 K\u00fclt\u00fcr ve Tabiat Varl\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 Koruma Kanunu’nun 23<\/a>. maddesine ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Muris Latife U.’in Atat\u00fcrk’e yazd\u0131\u011f\u0131 mektuplar\u0131n yay\u0131nlanmas\u0131nda \u015f\u00fcpheli yazar taraf\u0131ndan \u00f6len ki\u015finin hat\u0131ras\u0131na hakaret olu\u015fturacak bir ifadenin bulunmam\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda sadece mektuplar\u0131 yay\u0131nlaman\u0131n belirtilen kapsamda de\u011ferlendirilemeyece\u011fidir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Haberle\u015fmenin ve \u00f6zel hayat\u0131n gizlili\u011fini ihlal bak\u0131m\u0131ndan da bak\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131nda \u015fikayete tabi bir su\u00e7 olan TCK’n\u0131n 132. ve 134. maddelerinde yer alan su\u00e7lar\u0131n \u00f6len ki\u015filer i\u00e7in d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fclemeyece\u011fidir. Bunun yan\u0131nda m\u00fcteveffa muris Latife U.’in miras\u00e7\u0131s\u0131 m\u00fc\u015ftekilerin de \u00f6zel hayatlar\u0131na ili\u015fkin bilginin yay\u0131nlanan mektuplarda da bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla belirtilen maddelerde haberle\u015fmenin ve \u00f6zel hayat\u0131n gizlili\u011fini ihlal su\u00e7unun da unsurlar\u0131 olu\u015fma maktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n 5846 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 85<\/a>\/1. maddedeki “Eser mahiyetinde olmasa bile, mektup, hat\u0131ra ve buna benzer yaz\u0131lar\u0131n” yay\u0131nlanamayaca\u011f\u0131 h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fcn ihlal edildi\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fclse bile, ayn\u0131 f\u0131krada “Me\u011fer ki, yazan\u0131n \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnden itibaren on y\u0131l ge\u00e7mi\u015f bulunsun.” h\u00fckm\u00fc nazara al\u0131nd\u0131\u011f\u0131nda 1975 y\u0131l\u0131nda \u00f6len muris bak\u0131m\u0131ndan maddede \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclen s\u00fcre doldu\u011fundan \u015f\u00fcphelinin eylemi bu madde kapsam\u0131nda da de\u011ferlendirilemeyecektir.<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u015e\u00fcphelinin mektuplar\u0131 yay\u0131nlamas\u0131 eylemi 2863 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’un 23<\/a> \/son maddesi bak\u0131m\u0131ndan incelendi\u011finde bu kapsama girmeyece\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r. \u00c7\u00fcnk\u00fc belirtilen maddede “Milli tarihimizdeki \u00f6nemleri sebebiyle, Milli M\u00fccadele ve T\u00fcrkiye Cumhuriyeti’nin kurulu\u015funa ait tarihi de\u011fer ta\u015f\u0131yan belge ve e\u015fyalar, Mustafa Kemal ATAT\u00dcRK’e ait zati e\u015fya, evrak, kitap, yaz\u0131 ve benzeri ta\u015f\u0131n\u0131rlar.” koruma alt\u0131na al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. As\u0131llar\u0131 elinde bulunmayan, m\u00fczayedeyi yapan A… A.\u015e.’den dijital ortamda temin etti\u011fi mektup kopyalar\u0131n\u0131 yay\u0131nlam\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda \u015f\u00fcphelinin eyleminin bu madde kapsam\u0131nda de\u011ferlendirilemeyece\u011fi gibi, A… A.\u015e. g\u00f6revlileri hakk\u0131nda da \u0130stanbul Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n 15.06.2009 tarihli iddianamesi ile 2863 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun’a muhalefetten kamu davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olup, ayr\u0131ca itiraza konu soru\u015fturmada \u015f\u00fcpheli hakk\u0131nda bu kapsamda bir i\u015flem yap\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 da a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131r.<\/p>\n\n\n\n SONU\u00c7 : <\/strong>\u0130zah edilen gerek\u00e7elerle kanun yarar\u0131na bozma talebine dayan\u0131larak d\u00fczenlenen tebli\u011fnamedeki bozma iste\u011fi yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclmedi\u011finden Bak\u0131rk\u00f6y Birinci A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi’nin 09.09.2009 tarih ve 2009\/277 de\u011fi\u015fik i\u015f say\u0131l\u0131 itiraz\u0131n reddine ili\u015fkin karar\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na dair talebin CMK’n\u0131n 309<\/a>. maddesi gere\u011fince REDD\u0130NE, dosyan\u0131n gere\u011fi i\u00e7in mahalline g\u00f6nderilmek \u00fczere Yarg\u0131tay Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131ma TEVD\u0130\u0130NE, 18.01.2012 tarihinde oybirli\u011fiyle karar verildi.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Kaynak: Kazanc\u0131 \u0130\u00e7tihat Program\u0131<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Bili\u015fim su\u00e7lar\u0131 ve ceza hukuku alan\u0131nda (haberle\u015fmenin gizlili\u011fini ihlal su\u00e7u: TCK 132) avukatlar\u0131n da i\u015fine yarayabilecek bir karar\u0131 payla\u015f\u0131yorum. Avukat Do\u00e7. Dr. \u015eaban Cankat TA\u015eKIN, Bursa Barosu T.C. YARGITAY 12. CEZA DA\u0130RES\u0130 E. 2011\/7330 K. 2012\/407 T. 18.1.2012 \u2022 HABERLE\u015eMEN\u0130N … Okumaya devam et